arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2412.13670cs.CLcs.LG
收藏

AntiLeakBench:通过自动构建包含更新现实世界知识的基准来防止数据污染

AntiLeakBench: Preventing Data Contamination by Automatically Constructing Benchmarks with Updated Real-World Knowledge

Nanyang Technological University(南洋理工大学);University of California, Santa Barbara(加州大学圣芭芭拉分校);National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学);Shanghai Jiao Tong University(上海交通大学);University of Arizona(亚利桑那大学)

Xiaobao Wu, Liangming Pan, Yuxi Xie, Ruiwen Zhou, Shuai Zhao, Yubo Ma, Mingzhe Du, Rui Mao, Anh Tuan Luu, William Yang Wang

AI总结:

本文提出AntiLeak-Bench,一个自动防泄漏基准框架,通过构建包含LLM训练集中明确缺失的新知识的样本,并设计全自动化工作流,实现严格无污染的LLM评估,显著降低基准维护成本。

摘要:

数据污染通过将测试数据引入新模型的训练集,阻碍了公平的LLM评估。现有研究通过使用新收集的数据更新基准来解决这一挑战。然而,它们无法保证无污染评估,因为新收集的数据可能包含已有知识,且其基准更新依赖大量人工劳动。为了解决这些问题,我们在本文中提出AntiLeak-Bench,一个自动防泄漏基准框架。我们不再简单使用新收集的数据,而是构建了包含LLM训练集中明确缺失的新知识的样本,从而确保严格的无污染评估。我们进一步设计了一个完全自动化的工作流,无需人工即可构建和更新我们的基准。这显著降低了基准维护成本,以适应新兴的LLM。通过大量实验,我们强调数据污染很可能存在于LLM的截止时间之前,并证明AntiLeak-Bench有效克服了这一挑战。

英文摘要:

Data contamination hinders fair LLM evaluation by introducing test data into newer models' training sets. Existing studies solve this challenge by updating benchmarks with newly collected data. However, they fail to guarantee contamination-free evaluation as the newly collected data may contain pre-existing knowledge, and their benchmark updates rely on intensive human labor. To address these issues, we in this paper propose AntiLeak-Bench, an automated anti-leakage benchmarking framework. Instead of simply using newly collected data, we construct samples with explicitly new knowledge absent from LLMs' training sets, which thus ensures strictly contamination-free evaluation. We further design a fully automated workflow to build and update our benchmark without human labor. This significantly reduces the cost of benchmark maintenance to accommodate emerging LLMs. Through extensive experiments, we highlight that data contamination likely exists before LLMs' cutoff time and demonstrate AntiLeak-Bench effectively overcomes this challenge.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑