arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2412.09115q-bio.NCcs.CVcs.LGcs.NE

训练用于估计空间潜变量的视觉 CNN 学到了与腹侧流对齐的相似表征

Vision CNNs trained to estimate spatial latents learned similar ventral-stream-aligned representations

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT(麻省理工学院脑与认知科学系)

Yudi Xie, Weichen Huang, Esther Alter, Jeremy Schwartz, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, James J. DiCarlo

AI总结:

该研究用三维合成图像训练 CNN 估计空间潜变量,发现少量空间目标即可获得与数百类分类训练相当的腹侧流神经对齐,说明分类并非唯一合理的优化目标。

摘要:

关于灵长类腹侧视觉流功能作用的研究传统上聚焦于物体分类,却往往忽视——尽管已有大量先前证据——其在估计物体位置和姿态等“空间”潜变量方面的作用。大多数主流腹侧流模型都是通过为物体分类优化网络而得到的,这似乎意味着腹侧流也是在这样一种目标下形成的。在这里,我们探讨另一种假设:腹侧流是否可能是为估计空间潜变量而优化的?以及一个密切相关的问题:从空间潜变量估计中学到的表征与分类相比究竟有多大差异——如果确实存在差异的话?为提出这些问题,我们利用由三维图形引擎生成的合成图像数据集,训练卷积神经网络(CNN)来估计空间潜变量与类别潜变量的不同组合。我们发现,仅被训练估计少数几个空间潜变量的模型,所取得的神经对齐分数可与那些在数百个类别上训练的模型相比,而且模型的空间潜变量性能与其神经对齐程度强烈相关。空间潜变量训练模型与类别训练模型具有非常相似但并非完全相同的内部表征,尤其是在它们的早期和中层。我们提供证据表明,这种趋同部分是由训练数据中的非目标潜变量变异性驱动的,这种变异性促进了对那些非目标潜变量表征的内隐学习。综合来看,这些结果表明,许多训练目标(例如空间潜变量)都可以产生与腹侧流在神经上对齐的相似模型。因此,人们不应假定腹侧流仅为物体分类而优化。作为一个领域,我们需要继续锐化比较模型与大脑的度量,以更好地理解腹侧流的功能作用。

英文摘要:

Studies of the functional role of the primate ventral visual stream have traditionally focused on object categorization, often ignoring -- despite much prior evidence -- its role in estimating "spatial" latents such as object position and pose. Most leading ventral stream models are derived by optimizing networks for object categorization, which seems to imply that the ventral stream is also derived under such an objective. Here, we explore an alternative hypothesis: Might the ventral stream be optimized for estimating spatial latents? And a closely related question: How different -- if at all -- are representations learned from spatial latent estimation compared to categorization? To ask these questions, we leveraged synthetic image datasets generated by a 3D graphic engine and trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to estimate different combinations of spatial and category latents. We found that models trained to estimate just a few spatial latents achieve neural alignment scores comparable to those trained on hundreds of categories, and the spatial latent performance of models strongly correlates with their neural alignment. Spatial latent and category-trained models have very similar -- but not identical -- internal representations, especially in their early and middle layers. We provide evidence that this convergence is partly driven by non-target latent variability in the training data, which facilitates the implicit learning of representations of those non-target latents. Taken together, these results suggest that many training objectives, such as spatial latents, can lead to similar models aligned neurally with the ventral stream. Thus, one should not assume that the ventral stream is optimized for object categorization only. As a field, we need to continue to sharpen our measures of comparing models to brains to better understand the functional roles of the ventral stream.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑