arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2412.08066cs.LGcs.IR
收藏

用于推荐的集群增强联邦图神经网络

Cluster-Enhanced Federated Graph Neural Network for Recommendation

Haiyan Wang, Ye Yuan

AI总结:

针对联邦图神经网络推荐中个人图缺乏高阶协同信号且隐私风险高的问题,本文提出CFedGR框架,通过服务器聚类预训练用户表示增强个人图,并设计两种通信优化策略,在三个基准数据集上验证了有效性。

摘要:

在推荐系统中,个人交互数据可以被有效地建模为每个用户各自的图。基于图神经网络(GNNs)的推荐技术已经变得非常流行,因为它们通过将个人图聚合成全局交互图,能够捕捉用户与物品之间的高阶协同信号。然而,这种集中式方法本质上对用户隐私和安全构成威胁。最近,基于联邦GNN的推荐技术已成为缓解隐私问题的一种有前景的解决方案。尽管如此,当前实现要么将设备端训练限制在孤立的个人图上,要么必须依赖额外的第三方服务器来接触其他个人图,这也增加了隐私泄露的风险。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了一种用于推荐的集群增强联邦图神经网络框架,名为CFedGR,该框架以保护隐私的方式引入高阶协同信号来增强个人图。具体而言,服务器对预训练的用户表示进行聚类,以识别高阶协同信号。此外,我们设计了两种高效策略来减少设备与服务器之间的通信。在三个基准数据集上的大量实验验证了我们所提方法的有效性。

英文摘要:

Personal interaction data can be effectively modeled as individual graphs for each user in recommender systems.Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)-based recommendation techniques have become extremely popular since they can capture high-order collaborative signals between users and items by aggregating the individual graph into a global interactive graph.However, this centralized approach inherently poses a threat to user privacy and security. Recently, federated GNN-based recommendation techniques have emerged as a promising solution to mitigate privacy concerns. Nevertheless, current implementations either limit on-device training to an unaccompanied individual graphs or necessitate reliance on an extra third-party server to touch other individual graphs, which also increases the risk of privacy leakage. To address this challenge, we propose a Cluster-enhanced Federated Graph Neural Network framework for Recommendation, named CFedGR, which introduces high-order collaborative signals to augment individual graphs in a privacy preserving manner. Specifically, the server clusters the pretrained user representations to identify high-order collaborative signals. In addition, two efficient strategies are devised to reduce communication between devices and the server. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of our proposed methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑