arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2412.04063q-fin.GNecon.GNq-fin.EC
收藏

理解超额债券溢价

Understanding the Excess Bond Premium

Kevin Benson, Ing-Haw Cheng, John Hull, Charles Martineau, Yoshio Nozawa, Vasily Strela, Yuntao Wu, Jun Yuan

AI总结:

本文利用新闻对180个主题的月度关注度解释并预测 EBP,发现金融中介、危机与政治关注是其宏观预测力的主要来源。

摘要:

我们通过新闻视角研究 Gilchrist 和 Zakrajšek(2012)超额债券溢价(EBP)的驱动因素。新闻对180个主题给予的月度关注度(Bybee et al., 2024)能够捕捉 EBP 中至多80%的变化,而且这一变化成分可以预测宏观经济走势。新闻对金融中介和危机的关注度上升往往会推高 EBP,并预示宏观经济下行;而新闻对政治和科学的关注度上升往往会压低 EBP。基于关注度估计的 EBP 在很大程度上排除了直接情绪指标对宏观经济波动的预测能力,并且可以追溯预测20世纪初以来的商业周期。总体而言,我们将 EBP 对宏观经济走势的预测性变化归因于新闻对金融中介、危机和政治关注度的变化。

英文摘要:

We study the drivers of the Gilchrist and Zakrajšek (2012) excess bond premium (EBP) through the lens of the news. The monthly attention the news pays to 180 topics (Bybee et al., 2024) captures up to 80% of the variation in the EBP, and this component of variation forecasts macroeconomic movements. Greater news attention to financial intermediaries and crises tends to drive up the EBP and portend macroeconomic downturns, while greater news attention to politics and science tends to drive down the EBP. Attention-based estimates of EBP largely drive out the forecast power of direct sentiment measures for macroeconomic fluctuations and predict the business cycle going back to the early 1900's. Overall, we attribute predictive variation about the EBP for macroeconomic movements to variation in news attention to financial intermediaries, crises, and politics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑