arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2412.02492cs.DScs.LGstat.ML
收藏

一致性的代价:具有常数追索权的子模最大化

The Cost of Consistency: Submodular Maximization with Constant Recourse

Google Research(谷歌研究院);Sapienza University of Rome(罗马第一大学);École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne(洛桑联邦理工学院)

Paul Dütting, Federico Fusco, Silvio Lattanzi, Ashkan Norouzi-Fard, Ola Svensson, Morteza Zadimoghaddam

AI总结:

本文研究在线子模最大化中常数追索权对近似比的影响,给出一般单调函数 2/3、覆盖函数 3/4 的紧信息论界,并用 0.51 近似的多项式时间随机算法证明确定性与随机算法的分离。

摘要:

在本工作中,我们研究在线子模最大化,以及维持稳定解的要求如何影响近似比。具体而言,当算法在每一步至多被允许进行常数次更新时,我们寻求可达到的最佳近似比的界。我们证明,对于一般单调子模函数,存在一个紧的信息论界 2/3;对于覆盖函数,则有一个改进的(同样紧的)界 3/4。由于这两个界均由非多项式时间算法达到,我们还给出一种多项式时间随机算法,可实现 0.51 近似。结合先前工作中确定性算法 1/2 的信息论难度,我们的工作因此表明,无论在信息论层面还是在多项式时间算法层面,确定性算法与随机算法之间都存在分离。

英文摘要:

In this work, we study online submodular maximization, and how the requirement of maintaining a stable solution impacts the approximation. In particular, we seek bounds on the best-possible approximation ratio that is attainable when the algorithm is allowed to make at most a constant number of updates per step. We show a tight information-theoretic bound of $\tfrac{2}{3}$ for general monotone submodular functions, and an improved (also tight) bound of $\tfrac{3}{4}$ for coverage functions. Since both these bounds are attained by non poly-time algorithms, we also give a poly-time randomized algorithm that achieves a $0.51$-approximation. Combined with an information-theoretic hardness of $\tfrac{1}{2}$ for deterministic algorithms from prior work, our work thus shows a separation between deterministic and randomized algorithms, both information theoretically and for poly-time algorithms.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑