arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2411.05195cs.LGcs.CLcs.CV

探索生成式多模态大语言模型如何在使用相同视觉编码器时比 CLIP 感知更多

Exploring How Generative MLLMs Perceive More Than CLIP with the Same Vision Encoder

University of Washington(华盛顿大学)

Siting Li, Pang Wei Koh, Simon Shaolei Du

AI总结:

本文揭示生成式多模态大语言模型在使用与 CLIP 相同的视觉编码器时能更有效地提取视觉信息,并通过受控实验证明其优势源于 patch tokens、位置嵌入和提示加权等架构设计,为改进对比式视觉语言模型提供了方向。

摘要:

近期研究表明,CLIP 模型在需要组合性定位、理解空间关系或捕捉细粒度细节的视觉推理任务上表现不佳。一个自然的假设是 CLIP 视觉编码器没有嵌入这些任务所需的关键信息。然而,我们发现情况并非总是如此:编码器收集了与查询相关的视觉信息,而 CLIP 未能将其提取出来。具体而言,我们证明视觉语言模型(VLMs)的另一分支——生成式多模态大语言模型(MLLMs),在使用相同的视觉编码器和权重的情况下,在许多此类任务上取得了显著高于 CLIP 的准确率,这表明这些生成式 MLLMs 感知得更多——因为它们能更有效地提取和利用视觉信息。我们进行了一系列受控实验,揭示它们的成功归因于多个关键设计选择,包括 patch tokens、位置嵌入和基于提示的加权。另一方面,仅增强训练数据或使用更强的文本编码器并不足以解决该任务,而额外的文本 token 带来的收益也很有限。有趣的是,我们发现细粒度视觉推理并非自回归损失训练的生成式模型所独有:当这些 MLLMs 通过对比微调转换为类似 CLIP 的编码器后,在相同的基于余弦相似度的评估协议下仍然优于 CLIP。我们的研究强调了 VLM 架构选择的重要性,并为提升类似 CLIP 的对比式视觉语言模型的性能指明了方向。

英文摘要:

Recent research has shown that CLIP models struggle with visual reasoning tasks that require grounding compositionality, understanding spatial relationships, or capturing fine-grained details. One natural hypothesis is that the CLIP vision encoder does not embed essential information for these tasks. However, we find that this is not always the case: The encoder gathers query-relevant visual information, while CLIP fails to extract it. In particular, we show that another branch of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), Generative Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), achieve significantly higher accuracy than CLIP in many of these tasks using the same vision encoder and weights, indicating that these Generative MLLMs perceive more -- as they extract and utilize visual information more effectively. We conduct a series of controlled experiments and reveal that their success is attributed to multiple key design choices, including patch tokens, position embeddings, and prompt-based weighting. On the other hand, enhancing the training data alone or applying a stronger text encoder does not suffice to solve the task, and additional text tokens offer little benefit. Interestingly, we find that fine-grained visual reasoning is not exclusive to generative models trained by an autoregressive loss: When converted into CLIP-like encoders by contrastive finetuning, these MLLMs still outperform CLIP under the same cosine similarity-based evaluation protocol. Our study highlights the importance of VLM architectural choices and suggests directions for improving the performance of CLIP-like contrastive VLMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑