arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2411.03439quant-phcs.IThep-thmath.IT
收藏

走向量子加速的熵约束

Towards Entropic Constraints on Quantum Speedups

Jason Pollack, Dylan VanAllen

AI总结:

本文构建熵分析框架,检验Grover搜索、量子傅里叶变换和相位估计中的量子加速,发现已知熵不等式不足以识别加速,但互信息单配性在某些电路中被违反。

摘要:

一些量子算法具有“量子加速”:与解决相同任务的最佳已知经典算法相比,其时间复杂度有所改进。我们能否从熵的角度理解是什么推动了这些加速?信息论为我们提供了多种度量指标,可用于衡量运行算法的量子计算机的行为在多大程度上是根本性的“量子”的。在算法运行过程中,可以分析量子计算机中量子比特子系统的纠缠熵。本文构建了一个进行这种熵分析的框架,并对实现已知快速量子算法和子程序的一系列量子电路进行了分析:Grover搜索、量子傅里叶变换和相位估计。我们的结果在很大程度上不尽如人意:已知的熵不等式不足以识别量子加速的存在与否。尽管我们知道我们的算法必须具有量子“魔力”,但Ingleton不等式(对所有稳定子状态的子系统的熵都成立)在我们的任何示例中都没有被违反。然而,在某些情况下,互信息的单配性(乘积状态满足,但高度纠缠的双粒子状态如GHZ状态违反)在我们的量子电路运行过程中的某个时刻失效。

英文摘要:

Some quantum algorithms have "quantum speedups": improved time complexity as compared with the best-known classical algorithms for solving the same tasks. Can we understand what fuels these speedups from an entropic perspective? Information theory gives us a multitude of metrics we might choose from to measure how fundamentally 'quantum' is the behavior of a quantum computer running an algorithm. The entanglement entropies for subsystems of a quantum state can be analyzed for subsystems of qubits in a quantum computer throughout the running of an algorithm. Here, a framework for making this entropic analysis is constructed, and performed on a selection of quantum circuits implementing known fast quantum algorithms and subroutines: Grover search, the quantum Fourier transform, and phase estimation. Our results are largely unsatisfactory: known entropy inequalities do not suffice to identify the presence or absence of quantum speedups. Although we know our algorithms must have quantum "magic", the Ingleton inequality, which holds for all entropies of subsystems of stabilizer states, is not violated in any of our examples. In some cases, however, monogamy of mutual information, which is obeyed for product states but violated for highly entangled bipartite states such as the $GHZ$ states, fails at some point in the course of our quantum circuits.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑