arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2411.00027cs.CL

大型语言模型的个性化:综述

Personalization of Large Language Models: A Survey

Dartmouth College(达特茅斯学院);Adobe Research(Adobe研究);Stanford University(斯坦福大学);University of Massachusetts Amherst(马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校);Pattern Data;Vanderbilt University(范德比尔特大学);Dolby Research(Dolby研究);University of California San Diego(加州大学圣地亚哥分校);Cisco Research(思科研究);University of Oregon(俄勒冈大学)
Zhehao Zhang, Ryan A. Rossi, Branislav Kveton, Yijia Shao, Diyi Yang, Hamed Zamani, Franck Dernoncourt, Joe Barrow, Tong Yu, Sungchul Kim, Ruiyi Zhang, Jiuxiang… 展开作者

Zhehao Zhang, Ryan A. Rossi, Branislav Kveton, Yijia Shao, Diyi Yang, Hamed Zamani, Franck Dernoncourt, Joe Barrow, Tong Yu, Sungchul Kim, Ruiyi Zhang, Jiuxiang Gu, Tyler Derr, Hongjie Chen, Junda Wu, Xiang Chen, Zichao Wang, Subrata Mitra, Nedim Lipka, Nesreen Ahmed, Yu Wang

AI总结:

本文首次通过引入系统分类法,弥合个性化文本生成与下游应用两条研究方向的鸿沟,形式化LLM个性化基础,统一梳理粒度、技术、数据集、评估与应用,并指出开放挑战以指导未来研究。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)的个性化在广泛的应用中日益重要。尽管其重要性和近期进展,现有关于个性化LLM的大多数工作完全集中于(a)个性化文本生成,或(b)利用LLM处理与个性化相关的下游应用(如推荐系统)。在本工作中,我们首次通过引入个性化LLM使用的分类法并总结关键差异与挑战,弥合了这两个独立主要方向之间的鸿沟。我们提供了个性化LLM基础的形式化表示,整合并扩展了LLM个性化的概念,定义并讨论了个性化、使用方式以及个性化LLM需求的新维度。随后,通过提出针对个性化粒度、个性化技术、数据集、评估方法和个性化LLM应用的系统分类法,我们统一了这些跨领域和跨使用场景的文献。最后,我们强调了仍待解决的挑战与重要开放问题。通过利用所提出的分类法统一并综述近期研究,我们旨在为现有文献和LLM个性化的不同维度提供清晰指南,赋能研究人员与从业者。

英文摘要:

Personalization of Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently become increasingly important with a wide range of applications. Despite the importance and recent progress, most existing works on personalized LLMs have focused either entirely on (a) personalized text generation or (b) leveraging LLMs for personalization-related downstream applications, such as recommendation systems. In this work, we bridge the gap between these two separate main directions for the first time by introducing a taxonomy for personalized LLM usage and summarizing the key differences and challenges. We provide a formalization of the foundations of personalized LLMs that consolidates and expands notions of personalization of LLMs, defining and discussing novel facets of personalization, usage, and desiderata of personalized LLMs. We then unify the literature across these diverse fields and usage scenarios by proposing systematic taxonomies for the granularity of personalization, personalization techniques, datasets, evaluation methods, and applications of personalized LLMs. Finally, we highlight challenges and important open problems that remain to be addressed. By unifying and surveying recent research using the proposed taxonomies, we aim to provide a clear guide to the existing literature and different facets of personalization in LLMs, empowering both researchers and practitioners.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑