arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2410.20366cs.LGcs.SI
收藏

重新思考基于重构的图级异常检测:局限性与一种简单补救方法

Rethinking Reconstruction-based Graph-Level Anomaly Detection: Limitations and a Simple Remedy

Kim Jaechul Graduate School of AI(金在哲人工智能研究生院)

Sunwoo Kim, Soo Yong Lee, Fanchen Bu, Shinhwan Kang, Kyungho Kim, Jaemin Yoo, Kijung Shin

AI总结:

针对基于图自编码器的图级异常检测依赖平均重构误差的局限,本文揭示“重构翻转”现象,并提出利用多方面重构误差汇总的简单方法 MUSE,在 10 个数据集、14 种方法中取得最优总体性能。

摘要:

图自编码器(Graph-AEs)通过力求准确重构给定图来学习其表示。Graph-AEs 的一个显著应用是图级异常检测(GLAD),其目标是识别与大多数图群体相比具有异常拓扑结构和/或节点特征的图。用于 GLAD 的 Graph-AEs 将具有高平均重构误差(即来自所有节点对和/或节点的误差均值)的图视为异常。也就是说,这些方法依赖于这样一个假设:它们能够更好地重构与大多数图具有相似特征的图。然而,我们报告了不可忽视的反例,即一种我们称为重构翻转的现象,并强调了现有基于 Graph-AE 的 GLAD 方法的局限性。具体而言,我们从实证和理论两方面研究了该假设何时成立、何时失效。通过分析,我们进一步认为,尽管给定图的重构误差是 GLAD 的有效特征,但利用重构误差的多方面汇总信息(而不仅仅是均值)可以进一步增强这些特征。因此,我们提出了一种新颖且简单的 GLAD 方法,名为 MUSE。MUSE 的关键创新在于将重构误差的多方面汇总作为 GLAD 的图特征。这种出奇简单的方法在 GLAD 中取得了 SOTA 性能,在 10 个数据集上的 14 种方法中总体表现最佳。

英文摘要:

Graph autoencoders (Graph-AEs) learn representations of given graphs by aiming to accurately reconstruct them. A notable application of Graph-AEs is graph-level anomaly detection (GLAD), whose objective is to identify graphs with anomalous topological structures and/or node features compared to the majority of the graph population. Graph-AEs for GLAD regard a graph with a high mean reconstruction error (i.e. mean of errors from all node pairs and/or nodes) as anomalies. Namely, the methods rest on the assumption that they would better reconstruct graphs with similar characteristics to the majority. We, however, report non-trivial counter-examples, a phenomenon we call reconstruction flip, and highlight the limitations of the existing Graph-AE-based GLAD methods. Specifically, we empirically and theoretically investigate when this assumption holds and when it fails. Through our analyses, we further argue that, while the reconstruction errors for a given graph are effective features for GLAD, leveraging the multifaceted summaries of the reconstruction errors, beyond just mean, can further strengthen the features. Thus, we propose a novel and simple GLAD method, named MUSE. The key innovation of MUSE involves taking multifaceted summaries of reconstruction errors as graph features for GLAD. This surprisingly simple method obtains SOTA performance in GLAD, performing best overall among 14 methods across 10 datasets.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑