arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2410.16632cs.ROcs.LG
收藏

连续控制策略中的平滑性基准测试与高频振荡抑制

Benchmarking Smoothness and Reducing High-Frequency Oscillations in Continuous Control Policies

Inventec Corporation(英业达股份有限公司)

Guilherme Christmann, Ying-Sheng Luo, Hanjaya Mandala, Wei-Chao Chen

AI总结:

本文针对深度强化学习策略的高频振荡问题,系统比较损失正则化与架构方法,并提出混合方法,在多个仿真及真实机器人任务上实现控制平滑性提升26.8%且性能退化仅2.8%。

摘要:

强化学习(RL)策略容易产生高频振荡,在部署到真实世界硬件时尤其不受欢迎。本文识别、分类并比较了文献中旨在减轻深度强化学习中高频振荡的方法。我们定义了两大类方法:损失正则化方法和架构方法。这些方法的核心在于激励学习平滑映射,使得输入空间中相近的状态在输出空间中产生相近的动作。我们在Gymnasium的传统RL环境、一个复杂操作任务以及三个包含真实世界硬件部署与评估的机器人运动任务上,从策略性能和控制平滑性两方面进行了基准测试。最后,我们还提出了结合损失正则化方法和架构方法元素的混合方法。我们发现,表现最佳的混合方法优于其他方法,与基线相比将控制平滑性提高了26.8%,而最坏情况下的性能退化仅为2.8%。

英文摘要:

Reinforcement learning (RL) policies are prone to high-frequency oscillations, especially undesirable when deploying to hardware in the real-world. In this paper, we identify, categorize, and compare methods from the literature that aim to mitigate high-frequency oscillations in deep RL. We define two broad classes: loss regularization and architectural methods. At their core, these methods incentivize learning a smooth mapping, such that nearby states in the input space produce nearby actions in the output space. We present benchmarks in terms of policy performance and control smoothness on traditional RL environments from the Gymnasium and a complex manipulation task, as well as three robotics locomotion tasks that include deployment and evaluation with real-world hardware. Finally, we also propose hybrid methods that combine elements from both loss regularization and architectural methods. We find that the best-performing hybrid outperforms other methods, and improves control smoothness by 26.8% over the baseline, with a worst-case performance degradation of just 2.8%.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑