arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2410.08044cs.CL
收藏

AI生成内容在维基百科中的兴起

The Rise of AI-Generated Content in Wikipedia

Princeton University(普林斯顿大学)

Creston Brooks, Samuel Eggert, Denis Peskoff

AI总结:

研究使用GPTZero和Binoculars检测维基百科页面,发现近期创建的页面中AI生成内容显著增加,且被标记的文章质量较低、存在偏见。

摘要:

流行信息源中AI生成内容的兴起引发了对问责制、准确性和偏见放大的严重担忧。除了直接影响消费者外,这类内容的广泛存在也对通过大规模互联网抓取来训练语言模型的长期可行性提出了疑问。我们使用专有AI检测器GPTZero和开源替代方案Binoculars,来确定近期创建的维基百科页面中AI生成内容的下限。与GPT-3.5发布前的页面相比,两种检测器均显示近期页面中AI生成内容显著增加。在将阈值校准为对GPT-3.5前文章达到1%的误报率的情况下,检测器将超过5%的新创建英文维基百科文章标记为AI生成,而德语、法语和意大利语文章的比例较低。被标记的维基百科文章通常质量较低,且往往具有自我推销性质,或在争议话题上偏向特定观点。

英文摘要:

The rise of AI-generated content in popular information sources raises significant concerns about accountability, accuracy, and bias amplification. Beyond directly impacting consumers, the widespread presence of this content poses questions for the long-term viability of training language models on vast internet sweeps. We use GPTZero, a proprietary AI detector, and Binoculars, an open-source alternative, to establish lower bounds on the presence of AI-generated content in recently created Wikipedia pages. Both detectors reveal a marked increase in AI-generated content in recent pages compared to those from before the release of GPT-3.5. With thresholds calibrated to achieve a 1% false positive rate on pre-GPT-3.5 articles, detectors flag over 5% of newly created English Wikipedia articles as AI-generated, with lower percentages for German, French, and Italian articles. Flagged Wikipedia articles are typically of lower quality and are often self-promotional or partial towards a specific viewpoint on controversial topics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑