arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2410.06385eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV

皮肤癌机器学习模型的肤色偏差

Skin Cancer Machine Learning Model Tone Bias

University of Bristol(布里斯托大学);Jean Golding Institute(让·戈尔丁研究所);Massachusetts Institute of Technology(麻省理工学院);University of Alabama at Birmingham(阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校)

James Pope, Md Hassanuzzaman, William Chapman, Huw Day, Mingmar Sherpa, Omar Emara, Nirmala Adhikari, Ayush Joshi

AI总结:

本研究针对皮肤癌机器学习模型的肤色偏差问题,用ISIC档案的不平衡与平衡数据集训练深度卷积神经网络,发现两类数据集训练的模型差异性影响均低于0.80阈值,证实偏差存在且非肤色不平衡导致,为后续偏差治理提供依据。

摘要:

研究背景:许多开源皮肤癌图像数据集均由肤色较浅国家开展的临床试验产生。受这种肤色不平衡影响,基于这些数据集训练的机器学习模型在检测浅肤色人群的皮肤癌时表现较好。这类模型存在的任何肤色偏差都可能引发公平性问题,降低公众对人工智能医疗领域的信任。\n研究方法:我们选取了国际皮肤成像协作组织(International Skin Imaging Collaboration, ISIC)档案中带有肤色信息的图像子集,该子集存在显著的肤色不平衡问题,这类不平衡可能是模型产生肤色偏差的原因。为解决这一问题,我们分别使用不平衡数据集和平衡数据集训练模型以进行对比。我们利用这些数据集训练深度卷积神经网络模型,将图像分类为恶性或良性,随后基于选择率评估模型针对深肤色与浅肤色的差异性影响。\n研究结果:使用不平衡数据集训练时,模型检测浅肤色恶性图像的能力显著更优,差异性影响值为0.577;使用平衡数据集训练时,模型检测浅肤色恶性图像的能力仍显著优于深肤色,差异性影响值为0.684。无论使用不平衡还是平衡数据集训练模型,其差异性影响都远低于0.80的标准阈值,表明模型存在肤色偏差。\n研究结论:结果表明,典型的皮肤癌机器学习模型可能存在肤色偏差,且有证据表明诊断差异或肤色不平衡并非偏差产生的原因。未来需要探索其他技术来识别和解决这类模型中的偏差,这将是后续的研究方向。

英文摘要:

Background: Many open-source skin cancer image datasets are the result of clinical trials conducted in countries with lighter skin tones. Due to this tone imbalance, machine learning models derived from these datasets can perform well at detecting skin cancer for lighter skin tones. Any tone bias in these models could introduce fairness concerns and reduce public trust in the artificial intelligence health field. Methods: We examine a subset of images from the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) archive that provide tone information. The subset has a significant tone imbalance. These imbalances could explain a model's tone bias. To address this, we train models using the imbalanced dataset and a balanced dataset to compare against. The datasets are used to train a deep convolutional neural network model to classify the images as malignant or benign. We then evaluate the models' disparate impact, based on selection rate, relative to dark or light skin tone. Results: Using the imbalanced dataset, we found that the model is significantly better at detecting malignant images in lighter tone resulting in a disparate impact of 0.577. Using the balanced dataset, we found that the model is also significantly better at detecting malignant images in lighter versus darker tones with a disparate impact of 0.684. Using the imbalanced or balanced dataset to train the model still results in a disparate impact well below the standard threshold of 0.80 which suggests the model is biased with respect to skin tone. Conclusion: The results show that typical skin cancer machine learning models can be tone biased. These results provide evidence that diagnosis or tone imbalance is not the cause of the bias. Other techniques will be necessary to identify and address the bias in these models, an area of future investigation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑