arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2410.06352cs.LG
收藏

概念瓶颈模型中基于树的泄漏检测与控制

Tree-Based Leakage Inspection and Control in Concept Bottleneck Models

Imperial College London(帝国理工学院)

Angelos Ragkousis, Sonali Parbhoo

AI总结:

针对概念瓶颈模型(CBMs)存在的信息泄漏影响可解释性的问题,提出基于决策树的泄漏检测控制方法,通过对比软硬CBMs决策路径量化泄漏,提升了任务准确率与解释的透明度和信息量。

摘要:

随着AI模型规模不断扩大,对可问责性与可解释性的需求对于理解其决策过程而言愈发关键。概念瓶颈模型(Concept Bottleneck Models, CBMs)因先将输入映射到中间概念再生成最终预测、可提升可解释性而受到关注。然而,CBMs常存在信息泄漏问题,即模型会利用概念未捕获的额外输入数据来提升任务性能,导致下游预测的解释变得复杂。本文提出一种可同时训练联合式与序列式CBMs的新方法,能够借助决策树识别并控制泄漏。我们的方法通过对比硬CBMs与带泄漏的软CBMs的决策路径来量化泄漏程度。具体而言,我们证明软泄漏CBMs会扩展硬CBMs的决策路径,在概念信息不完整的情况下尤为明显。基于这一洞见,我们开发了一种技术以更好地检测和管理泄漏,隔离受泄漏影响最大的数据子集。通过合成实验与真实世界实验,我们证明以这种方式控制泄漏不仅能提升任务准确率,还能生成更具信息量、更透明的解释。

英文摘要:

As AI models grow larger, the demand for accountability and interpretability has become increasingly critical for understanding their decision-making processes. Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have gained attention for enhancing interpretability by mapping inputs to intermediate concepts before making final predictions. However, CBMs often suffer from information leakage, where additional input data, not captured by the concepts, is used to improve task performance, complicating the interpretation of downstream predictions. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for training both joint and sequential CBMs that allows us to identify and control leakage using decision trees. Our method quantifies leakage by comparing the decision paths of hard CBMs with their soft, leaky counterparts. Specifically, we show that soft leaky CBMs extend the decision paths of hard CBMs, particularly in cases where concept information is incomplete. Using this insight, we develop a technique to better inspect and manage leakage, isolating the subsets of data most affected by this. Through synthetic and real-world experiments, we demonstrate that controlling leakage in this way not only improves task accuracy but also yields more informative and transparent explanations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑