arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2410.04980cs.CV

基于无标记二维图像方法的婴儿姿态估计比较

Comparison of marker-less 2D image-based methods for infant pose estimation

University Medical Center Göttingen(戈滕堡大学医学中心);German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ)(德国儿童与青少年健康研究中心);Leibniz ScienceCampus Göttingen(戈滕堡莱比锡科学校园);University of Göttingen(戈滕堡大学);III Institute of Physics - Biophysics(物理-生物物理第三研究所);University Hospital Heidelberg(海德堡大学医院);Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg(海德堡鲁珀特-卡尔大学);Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry(儿童与青少年精神病科部门);Medical University of Graz(格拉茨医学院);Curtin Autism Research Group(库林自闭症研究组);Curtin School of Allied Health(库林健康联盟学校);Curtin University(库林大学);Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND)(神经发育障碍中心(KIND));Department of Women’s and Children’s Health(妇女与儿童健康部门);Center for Psychiatry Research(精神医学研究中心);Karolinska Institutet(卡罗林斯卡研究所);Region Stockholm(斯德哥尔摩地区);Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm(斯德哥尔摩健康服务儿童与青少年精神病科,斯德哥尔摩地区);Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm(斯德哥尔摩健康服务,斯德哥尔摩地区)

Lennart Jahn, Sarah Flügge, Dajie Zhang, Luise Poustka, Sven Bölte, Florentin Wörgötter, Peter B Marschik, Tomas Kulvicius

AI总结:

本研究比较通用与婴儿姿态估计器在自动GMA中的性能及视角影响,发现ViTPose最优,俯视角显著优于对角线视角,且婴儿专用模型泛化有限。

摘要:

在本研究中,我们比较了现有的通用姿态估计器和婴儿姿态估计器在基于视频的自动全身运动评估(GMA)中的性能,以及最佳拍摄视角的选择,即GMA中常用的对角线视角与俯视角。我们使用了来自75段婴儿自发运动功能录像(婴儿年龄4至26周)中的4500个带标注的视频帧。为了确定在GMA相关场景下哪种姿态估计方法和相机角度能对婴儿产生最佳的姿态估计精度,我们计算并比较了与人工标注的距离以及关键点正确率(PCK)。结果表明,在成人数据上训练的最佳通用模型ViTPose在婴儿数据上也表现最佳。我们未发现使用婴儿姿态估计器相比通用姿态估计器在我们的婴儿数据集上有任何改进。然而,当我们在我们的数据上重新训练一个通用模型时,姿态估计精度有显著提升。从俯视角获得的姿态估计精度显著优于对角线视角,尤其是对于髋部关键点的检测。结果还表明,婴儿姿态估计器对其他婴儿数据集的泛化能力有限,这提示在选择婴儿姿态估计器并将其用于其未训练过的婴儿数据集时应谨慎。虽然标准GMA方法使用对角线视角进行评估,但使用俯视角时姿态估计精度显著提高。这表明在自动GMA研究的录制设置中应包含俯视角。

英文摘要:

In this study we compare the performance of available generic- and infant-pose estimators for a video-based automated general movement assessment (GMA), and the choice of viewing angle for optimal recordings, i.e., conventional diagonal view used in GMA vs. top-down view. We used 4500 annotated video-frames from 75 recordings of infant spontaneous motor functions from 4 to 26 weeks. To determine which pose estimation method and camera angle yield the best pose estimation accuracy on infants in a GMA related setting, the distance to human annotations and the percentage of correct key-points (PCK) were computed and compared. The results show that the best performing generic model trained on adults, ViTPose, also performs best on infants. We see no improvement from using infant-pose estimators over the generic pose estimators on our infant dataset. However, when retraining a generic model on our data, there is a significant improvement in pose estimation accuracy. The pose estimation accuracy obtained from the top-down view is significantly better than that obtained from the diagonal view, especially for the detection of the hip key-points. The results also indicate limited generalization capabilities of infant-pose estimators to other infant datasets, which hints that one should be careful when choosing infant pose estimators and using them on infant datasets which they were not trained on. While the standard GMA method uses a diagonal view for assessment, pose estimation accuracy significantly improves using a top-down view. This suggests that a top-down view should be included in recording setups for automated GMA research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑