arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2410.03411cs.DBcs.LG
收藏

合成关系型数据的保真度与效用基准测试

Benchmarking the Fidelity and Utility of Synthetic Relational Data

Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana(卢布尔雅那大学计算机与信息科学学院)

Valter Hudovernik, Martin Jurkovič, Erik Štrumbelj

AI总结:

针对关系型数据合成方法缺乏统一实证评估的问题,研究整合最佳实践与新型鲁棒检测方法构建基准工具,对比6种方法后发现无方法能合成与原数据无差异的数据,且真实与合成数据在预测性能、特征重要性上呈中等相关。

摘要:

合成关系型数据已开始受到研究人员、从业者和产业界的更多关注。由于表间关系带来了额外复杂度,该任务比合成单表数据更困难。同理,关系型数据合成方法的基准测试也面临新的挑战。我们的研究动机在于,目前缺乏对前沿方法的实证评估,且人们对这类评估的实施方式存在认知空白。我们梳理了关系型数据合成的相关工作、常用基准数据集,以及衡量合成数据保真度与效用的方法。我们将最佳实践与一种新颖的鲁棒检测方法整合为基准测试工具,并用其对比了6种方法,其中包括2款商业工具。尽管部分方法表现优于其他方法,但没有任何方法能合成出与原始数据无法区分的数据集。在效用方面,我们通常观察到,真实数据与合成数据在模型预测性能和特征重要性两个维度均存在中等程度的相关性。

英文摘要:

Synthesizing relational data has started to receive more attention from researchers, practitioners, and industry. The task is more difficult than synthesizing a single table due to the added complexity of relationships between tables. For the same reason, benchmarking methods for synthesizing relational data introduces new challenges. Our work is motivated by a lack of an empirical evaluation of state-of-the-art methods and by gaps in the understanding of how such an evaluation should be done. We review related work on relational data synthesis, common benchmarking datasets, and approaches to measuring the fidelity and utility of synthetic data. We combine the best practices and a novel robust detection approach into a benchmarking tool and use it to compare six methods, including two commercial tools. While some methods are better than others, no method is able to synthesize a dataset that is indistinguishable from original data. For utility, we typically observe moderate correlation between real and synthetic data for both model predictive performance and feature importance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑