arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.18166econ.GNcs.GTq-fin.EC
收藏

向参与者描述延迟接受机制与防策略性:实验分析

Describing Deferred Acceptance and Strategyproofness to Participants: Experimental Analysis

Yannai A. Gonczarowski, Ori Heffetz, Guy Ishai, Clayton Thomas

AI总结:

本文通过激励性实验室实验测试参与者对DA匹配机制及防策略性的理解,发现新颖的菜单描述能显著提升对防策略性的理解,且理解水平较高的参与者更倾向于采取经典的占优策略。

摘要:

我们开展了一项激励性实验室实验,以测试参与者在不同传达方式下理解DA匹配机制及防策略性属性的能力。我们发现,尽管许多参与者能够(使用一种新颖的GUI)学习DA的机制并计算其结果,但这种理解并不意味着理解了防策略性(由专门设计的测试衡量)。然而,一种关于防策略性的新颖菜单描述在传达该属性方面显著优于其他处理方式。尽管行为效应平均较小,但防策略性理解水平高于特定阈值的参与者会以极高的比率采取经典的占优策略。

英文摘要:

We conduct an incentivized lab experiment to test participants' ability to understand the DA matching mechanism and the strategyproofness property, conveyed in different ways. We find that while many participants can (using a novel GUI) learn DA's mechanics and calculate its outcomes, such understanding does not imply understanding of strategyproofness (as measured by specially designed tests). However, a novel menu description of strategyproofness conveys this property significantly better than other treatments. While behavioral effects are small on average, participants with levels of strategyproofness understanding above a certain threshold play the classical dominant strategy at very high rates.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑