arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.17840cs.AI
收藏

使用因果机制偏移检测和测量混淆

Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts

Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad(印度理工学院海得拉巴分校)

Abbavaram Gowtham Reddy, Vineeth N Balasubramanian

AI总结:

本文提出一种放松因果充分性和参数假设的综合方法,利用非独立同分布数据的因果机制偏移来检测和测量混淆效应,实现混淆检测、分离已观测与未观测混淆及比较相对强度,并获得实验验证。

摘要:

从数据中检测和测量混淆效应是因果推断中的一个关键挑战。现有方法经常假设因果充分性,忽略了未观测混淆变量的存在。因果充分性既不切实际又无法通过经验检验。此外,现有方法对潜在的因果生成过程做出强参数假设,以保证混淆变量的可识别性。我们放松了因果充分性和参数假设,并利用因果发现和非独立同分布数据混淆分析的最新进展,提出了一种检测和测量混淆的综合方法。我们考虑了混淆的各种定义,并引入量身定制的方法来实现三个目标:(i)检测和测量一组变量间的混淆,(ii)分离已观测和未观测的混淆效应,以及(iii)理解不同变量集之间混淆偏差的相对强度。我们提出了混淆度量的有用性质,并给出了满足这些性质的度量。实验结果支持了理论分析。

英文摘要:

Detecting and measuring confounding effects from data is a key challenge in causal inference. Existing methods frequently assume causal sufficiency, disregarding the presence of unobserved confounding variables. Causal sufficiency is both unrealistic and empirically untestable. Additionally, existing methods make strong parametric assumptions about the underlying causal generative process to guarantee the identifiability of confounding variables. Relaxing the causal sufficiency and parametric assumptions and leveraging recent advancements in causal discovery and confounding analysis with non-i.i.d. data, we propose a comprehensive approach for detecting and measuring confounding. We consider various definitions of confounding and introduce tailored methodologies to achieve three objectives: (i) detecting and measuring confounding among a set of variables, (ii) separating observed and unobserved confounding effects, and (iii) understanding the relative strengths of confounding bias between different sets of variables. We present useful properties of a confounding measure and present measures that satisfy those properties. Empirical results support the theoretical analysis.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑