arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2409.15072cs.CRcs.CLcs.HCcs.LG
收藏

评估LLM在威胁情报富化中的可用性

Evaluating the Usability of LLMs in Threat Intelligence Enrichment

School of Computer Science University of Guelph Guelph, Canada

Sanchana Srikanth, Mohammad Hasanuzzaman, Farah Tasnur Meem

AI总结:

本研究对五种LLM在威胁情报富化中的可用性进行了全面评估,通过启发式走查和用户研究识别关键问题并提出改进建议,旨在弥合功能与用户体验的差距,促进更高效准确的威胁情报实践。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)有潜力通过自动化收集、预处理和分析威胁数据来显著增强威胁情报。然而,这些工具的可用性对于确保安全专业人员有效采用它们至关重要。尽管LLM具有先进的能力,但对其可靠性、准确性以及生成不准确信息的可能性的担忧依然存在。本研究对五种LLM(ChatGPT、Gemini、Cohere、Copilot和Meta AI)进行了全面的可用性评估,重点关注其在威胁情报富化中的用户界面设计、错误处理、学习曲线、性能以及与现有工具的集成。利用启发式走查和用户研究方法,我们识别了关键的可用性问题,并提供了可操作的改进建议。我们的研究结果旨在弥合LLM功能与用户体验之间的差距,从而通过确保这些工具用户友好且可靠,促进更高效和准确的威胁情报实践。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to significantly enhance threat intelligence by automating the collection, preprocessing, and analysis of threat data. However, the usability of these tools is critical to ensure their effective adoption by security professionals. Despite the advanced capabilities of LLMs, concerns about their reliability, accuracy, and potential for generating inaccurate information persist. This study conducts a comprehensive usability evaluation of five LLMs ChatGPT, Gemini, Cohere, Copilot, and Meta AI focusing on their user interface design, error handling, learning curve, performance, and integration with existing tools in threat intelligence enrichment. Utilizing a heuristic walkthrough and a user study methodology, we identify key usability issues and offer actionable recommendations for improvement. Our findings aim to bridge the gap between LLM functionality and user experience, thereby promoting more efficient and accurate threat intelligence practices by ensuring these tools are user-friendly and reliable.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑