arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.10488cs.CVcs.AI

预训练视觉-语言模型是否编码物体状态?

Do Pre-trained Vision-Language Models Encode Object States?

Brown University(布朗大学)

Kaleb Newman, Shijie Wang, Yuan Zang, David Heffren, Chen Sun

AI总结:

该研究构建ChangeIt-Frames数据集评估9款开源预训练VLM的物体状态编码能力,发现其虽能可靠识别物体却难区分物理状态,并提出三个改进方向,相关数据与代码已公开。

摘要:

对于视觉-语言模型(VLM)而言,要理解物理世界(例如因果关系),首要步骤是捕捉视觉世界的时间动态,比如物体的物理状态如何随时间演变(例如一整个苹果变成切开的苹果)。本文旨在探究在网络规模数据上预训练的VLM是否学会了编码物体状态,且这些状态可通过零样本文本提示提取。我们构建了一个物体状态识别数据集ChangeIt-Frames,并评估了9个开源VLM,包括采用对比学习目标和生成式目标训练的模型。我们观察到,尽管这些最先进的视觉-语言模型能可靠地执行物体识别,但它们始终无法准确区分物体的物理状态。通过大量实验,我们确定了VLM更好地编码物体状态的三个改进方向,即物体定位质量、将概念绑定到物体的架构,以及在物体状态上学习有判别力的视觉和语言编码器的训练目标。本文已公开数据和代码。

英文摘要:

For a vision-language model (VLM) to understand the physical world, such as cause and effect, a first step is to capture the temporal dynamics of the visual world, for example how the physical states of objects evolve over time (e.g. a whole apple into a sliced apple). Our paper aims to investigate if VLMs pre-trained on web-scale data learn to encode object states, which can be extracted with zero-shot text prompts. We curate an object state recognition dataset ChangeIt-Frames, and evaluate nine open-source VLMs, including models trained with contrastive and generative objectives. We observe that while these state-of-the-art vision-language models can reliably perform object recognition, they consistently fail to accurately distinguish the objects' physical states. Through extensive experiments, we identify three areas for improvements for VLMs to better encode object states, namely the quality of object localization, the architecture to bind concepts to objects, and the objective to learn discriminative visual and language encoders on object states. Data and code are released.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑