arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2409.09560cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

通过情感与语义分析评估图像字幕的真实性与质量

Evaluating authenticity and quality of image captions via sentiment and semantic analyses

Northeastern University(东北大学);HHMI - Janelia Research Campus(HHMI珍妮亚研究园区);The Knowledge House(知识之家)

Aleksei Krotov, Alison Tebo, Dylan K. Picart, Aaron Dean Algave

AI总结:

本研究针对众包图像字幕训练数据质量评估问题,提出结合情感与语义分析的方法,在COCO-MS数据集上验证了人工与模型生成字幕的情感、语义差异及与对象类别的关联。

摘要:

深度学习(DL)的发展在很大程度上依赖于海量标注数据,以支撑自然语言处理、计算机视觉等任务。具体而言,在图像转文本或图像转图像的处理流程中,模型可能会从人工生成的图像字幕中无意习得观点(情感)。此外,所提供字幕的多样性与差异性也会对学习过程产生影响。尽管大型数据集的标注工作主要依赖众包或数据工作者群体,但评估此类训练数据的质量至关重要。\n本研究提出了一种聚焦于情感与语义丰富度的评估方法。该方法被应用于COCO-MS数据集,该数据集包含约15万张带有分割对象的图像及对应的众包字幕。我们采用预训练模型(Twitter-RoBERTa-base和BERT-base)从字幕中提取情感得分与语义嵌入的变异性。通过多元线性回归,我们探究了情感得分、语义变异性与对象类别之间的关系。结果表明,尽管大多数字幕呈中性,但约6%的字幕表现出强烈情感,且这类情感受特定对象类别的影响。同一图像内字幕的语义变异性较低,且与对象类别无相关性。模型生成的字幕中,强烈情感的占比不足1.5%,这类情感不受对象类别影响,且与对应人工生成字幕的情感无相关性。本研究提出了一种结合图像内容评估众包或工作者生成字幕质量的方法。

英文摘要:

The growth of deep learning (DL) relies heavily on huge amounts of labelled data for tasks such as natural language processing and computer vision. Specifically, in image-to-text or image-to-image pipelines, opinion (sentiment) may be inadvertently learned by a model from human-generated image captions. Additionally, learning may be affected by the variety and diversity of the provided captions. While labelling large datasets has largely relied on crowd-sourcing or data-worker pools, evaluating the quality of such training data is crucial. This study proposes an evaluation method focused on sentiment and semantic richness. That method was applied to the COCO-MS dataset, comprising approximately 150K images with segmented objects and corresponding crowd-sourced captions. We employed pre-trained models (Twitter-RoBERTa-base and BERT-base) to extract sentiment scores and variability of semantic embeddings from captions. The relation of the sentiment score and semantic variability with object categories was examined using multiple linear regression. Results indicate that while most captions were neutral, about 6% of the captions exhibited strong sentiment influenced by specific object categories. Semantic variability of within-image captions remained low and uncorrelated with object categories. Model-generated captions showed less than 1.5% of strong sentiment which was not influenced by object categories and did not correlate with the sentiment of the respective human-generated captions. This research demonstrates an approach to assess the quality of crowd- or worker-sourced captions informed by image content.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑