躲避还是不躲避：探索虚拟现实中不同模态对个体龙卷风减灾行为的影响
To Shelter or Not To Shelter: Exploring the Influence of Different Modalities in Virtual Reality on Individuals' Tornado Mitigation Behaviors
AI总结：
针对传统自然灾害风险沟通缺乏沉浸感且效果不佳的问题，本文构建龙卷风风险沟通VR系统，并通过N=24的混合设计实验结合定量与定性分析，考察不同VR模态及重复沟通对减灾行为和风险习惯化的影响。
摘要：
在自然灾害发生前及时且充分的风险沟通能够减少极端天气事件造成的损失，并提供更具韧性的灾害准备。然而，现有的自然灾害风险沟通一直较为抽象、无效、缺乏沉浸感，有时甚至适得其反。将虚拟现实（VR）用于自然灾害风险沟通，通过提供沉浸式且引人入胜的体验，为现有风险沟通体系提供了一种有前景的替代方案。但是，VR中的不同模态如何影响个体与即将来临的自然灾害相关的减灾行为，目前仍不清楚。此外，VR系统中不同模态的重复风险沟通如何导致风险习惯化效应，也尚不明确。为填补这一知识空白，我们开发了一个带有龙卷风风险沟通场景的VR系统，并开展了一项混合设计的人体受试者实验（N = 24）。我们结合定量与定性结果，对研究进行了全面调查。
英文摘要：
Timely and adequate risk communication before natural hazards can reduce losses from extreme weather events and provide more resilient disaster preparedness. However, existing natural hazard risk communications have been abstract, ineffective, not immersive, and sometimes counterproductive. The implementation of virtual reality (VR) for natural hazard risk communication presents a promising alternative to the existing risk communication system by offering immersive and engaging experiences. However, it is still unknown how different modalities in VR could affect individuals' mitigation behaviors related to incoming natural hazards. In addition, it is also not clear how the repetitive risk communication of different modalities in the VR system leads to the effect of risk habituation. To fill the knowledge gap, we developed a VR system with a tornado risk communication scenario and conducted a mixed-design human subject experiment (N = 24). We comprehensively investigated our research using both quantitative and qualitative results.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
