arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.08752cs.LG
收藏

一种用于上下文特定多目标推荐优化的元学习与多臂老虎机混合方法

A Hybrid Meta-Learning and Multi-Armed Bandit Approach for Context-Specific Multi-Objective Recommendation Optimization

Expedia Group(亿客行集团)

Tiago Cunha, Andrea Marchini

AI总结:

针对在线推荐系统多目标平衡难题,提出结合元学习与多臂老虎机的Juggler-MAB混合方法,通过两阶段权重调整适配动态变化,在Expedia数据集上多项指标优于原模型。

摘要:

在线市场中的推荐系统面临平衡多目标以满足客户、供应商及平台自身等各利益相关方需求的挑战。本文提出Juggler-MAB,这是一种结合元学习与多臂老虎机(Multi-Armed Bandits, MAB)的混合方法,旨在解决现有多利益相关方推荐系统的局限性。该方法对Juggler框架进行了扩展——原框架采用元学习预测效用与补偿调整的最优权重,新方法则加入MAB组件以实现实时、上下文特定的优化调整。我们提出了两阶段方案:先由Juggler给出初始权重预测,再通过基于MAB的调整适应用户行为与市场状况的快速变化。系统利用设备类型、品牌等上下文特征,针对特定细分群体进行细粒度的权重调整。为评估该方法,我们使用Expedia住宿预订平台的60万次搜索数据集构建了仿真框架。结果显示,Juggler-MAB在所有指标上均优于原始Juggler模型,其中NDCG提升2.9%,遗憾值降低13.7%,最优臂选择率提升9.8%。

英文摘要:

Recommender systems in online marketplaces face the challenge of balancing multiple objectives to satisfy various stakeholders, including customers, providers, and the platform itself. This paper introduces Juggler-MAB, a hybrid approach that combines meta-learning with Multi-Armed Bandits (MAB) to address the limitations of existing multi-stakeholder recommendation systems. Our method extends the Juggler framework, which uses meta-learning to predict optimal weights for utility and compensation adjustments, by incorporating a MAB component for real-time, context-specific refinements. We present a two-stage approach where Juggler provides initial weight predictions, followed by MAB-based adjustments that adapt to rapid changes in user behavior and market conditions. Our system leverages contextual features such as device type and brand to make fine-grained weight adjustments based on specific segments. To evaluate our approach, we developed a simulation framework using a dataset of 0.6 million searches from Expedia's lodging booking platform. Results show that Juggler-MAB outperforms the original Juggler model across all metrics, with NDCG improvements of 2.9%, a 13.7% reduction in regret, and a 9.8% improvement in best arm selection rate.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑