arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.07488eess.SPcs.LG
收藏

基于对比学习的智能纺织品有限数据用户识别方法

Contrastive Learning-based User Identification with Limited Data on Smart Textiles

University of Science and Technology of China(中国科学技术大学)

Yunkang Zhang, Ziyu Wu, Zhen Liang, Fangting Xie, Quan Wan, Mingjie Zhao, Xiaohui Cai

AI总结:

针对压敏智能纺织品跨设备身份识别需大量设备专属数据的问题,提出基于双分支监督对比学习的方法,仅需少量姿势数据即可实现跨设备用户识别,准确率优于基线模型。

摘要:

压敏智能纺织品广泛应用于医疗健康、运动监测和智能家居领域。集成了压力传感阵列的设备有望实现场景的全面覆盖与多设备协同。然而,该场景下的基础功能身份识别,因不同设备间压力分布存在差异,需依赖大量特定于设备的数据集才能实现。为解决这一挑战,我们提出一种基于对比学习的新型用户识别方法。我们设计了两个并行分支,分别支持新设备和已有设备上的用户识别,在特征空间中采用监督对比学习以推动域统一。遇到新设备时,无需进行大量数据采集,仅需包含少数简单姿势的有限数据即可实现用户识别。通过在两个包含8名受试者的压力数据集(BedPressure和ChrPressure)上开展实验,我们提出的方法证明仅用含2种姿势的数据集,就能在12种坐姿场景下实现跨设备用户识别。其平均识别准确率达79.05%,较最优基线模型提升2.62%。

英文摘要:

Pressure-sensitive smart textiles are widely applied in the fields of healthcare, sports monitoring, and intelligent homes. The integration of devices embedded with pressure sensing arrays is expected to enable comprehensive scene coverage and multi-device integration. However, the implementation of identity recognition, a fundamental function in this context, relies on extensive device-specific datasets due to variations in pressure distribution across different devices. To address this challenge, we propose a novel user identification method based on contrastive learning. We design two parallel branches to facilitate user identification on both new and existing devices respectively, employing supervised contrastive learning in the feature space to promote domain unification. When encountering new devices, extensive data collection efforts are not required; instead, user identification can be achieved using limited data consisting of only a few simple postures. Through experimentation with two 8-subject pressure datasets (BedPressure and ChrPressure), our proposed method demonstrates the capability to achieve user identification across 12 sitting scenarios using only a dataset containing 2 postures. Our average recognition accuracy reaches 79.05%, representing an improvement of 2.62% over the best baseline model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑