arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2409.06289q-fin.PMcs.LGq-fin.PR
收藏

在量化投资中利用LLM实现策略寻找自动化

Automate Strategy Finding with LLM in Quant Investment

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology(香港科技大学);The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)(香港科技大学(广州));Peking University(北京大学)

Zhizhuo Kou, Holam Yu, Junyu Luo, Jingshu Peng, Xujia Li, Chengzhong Liu, Juntao Dai, Lei Chen, Sirui Han, Yike Guo

AI总结:

提出一种基于LLM的风险感知多智能体三阶段框架,通过生成Alpha因子、多模态评估和动态权重优化实现量化投资策略寻找自动化,在SSE50实现53.17%累计回报,显著优于基准。

摘要:

我们提出了一种新颖的三阶段框架,在风险感知的多智能体系统中利用大型语言模型(LLMs),用于量化金融中的策略寻找自动化。我们的方法通过以下方式解决了传统深度学习模型在金融应用中的脆弱性问题:采用提示工程化的LLMs在多样化金融数据上生成可执行的Alpha因子候选;实施基于多模态智能体的评估,根据市场状态、预测质量过滤因子,同时保持类别平衡;并部署适应市场条件的动态权重优化。实验结果表明,与既有基准相比,该策略在中美市场体制下表现出稳健的性能。我们的工作将LLMs的能力扩展到量化交易,为金融信号提取和投资组合构建提供了可扩展的架构。整体框架在SSE50上实现53.17%的累计回报(2023年1月至2024年1月),显著优于所有基准,展现出卓越的风险调整后表现和下行保护能力。

英文摘要:

We present a novel three-stage framework leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) within a risk-aware multi-agent system for automate strategy finding in quantitative finance. Our approach addresses the brittleness of traditional deep learning models in financial applications by: employing prompt-engineered LLMs to generate executable alpha factor candidates across diverse financial data, implementing multimodal agent-based evaluation that filters factors based on market status, predictive quality while maintaining category balance, and deploying dynamic weight optimization that adapts to market conditions. Experimental results demonstrate the robust performance of the strategy in Chinese & US market regimes compared to established benchmarks. Our work extends LLMs capabilities to quantitative trading, providing a scalable architecture for financial signal extraction and portfolio construction. The overall framework significantly outperforms all benchmarks with 53.17% cumulative return on SSE50 (Jan 2023 to Jan 2024), demonstrating superior risk-adjusted performance and downside protection on the market.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑