arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.06185cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG
收藏

大型语言模型能否解锁新颖的科学研究想法?

Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Patna(计算机科学与工程系,印度理工学院帕纳布分校);National Center for Computational Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory(计算科学国家中心,橡树岭国家实验室)

Sandeep Kumar, Tirthankar Ghosal, Vinayak Goyal, Asif Ekbal

AI总结:

本研究提出自动化评估指标(IAScore和想法独特性指数)及人工评估,检验大型语言模型从科学论文生成未来研究想法的能力与局限,并公开数据集和代码。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)和公开可用的ChatGPT的广泛采用,标志着人工智能(AI)融入人们日常生活的重大转折点。本研究考察了大型语言模型(LLMs)从科学论文中生成未来研究想法的能力。与摘要生成或翻译等任务不同,想法生成缺乏明确定义的参考集或结构,使得人工评估成为默认标准。然而,在这种情境下,人工评估极具挑战性,即:它需要大量的领域专业知识、对论文的上下文理解以及对当前研究格局的认知。这使得评估过程耗时、昂贵,并且从根本上不可扩展,尤其是在新LLM快速发布的背景下。目前,尚无专门为这一任务设计的自动化评估指标。为弥补这一空白,我们提出了两个自动化评估指标:想法一致性得分(IAScore)和想法独特性指数。我们进一步进行了人工评估,以评估所生成的未来研究想法的新颖性、相关性和可行性。本研究深入探讨了LLM在想法生成中不断演变的作用,突出了其能力与局限性。我们的工作为评估和利用语言模型生成未来研究想法的持续努力做出了贡献。我们公开了我们的数据集和代码。

英文摘要:

The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) and publicly available ChatGPT have marked a significant turning point in the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into people's everyday lives. This study examines the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate future research ideas from scientific papers. Unlike tasks such as summarization or translation, idea generation lacks a clearly defined reference set or structure, making manual evaluation the default standard. However, human evaluation in this setting is extremely challenging ie: it requires substantial domain expertise, contextual understanding of the paper, and awareness of the current research landscape. This makes it time-consuming, costly, and fundamentally non-scalable, particularly as new LLMs are being released at a rapid pace. Currently, there is no automated evaluation metric specifically designed for this task. To address this gap, we propose two automated evaluation metrics: Idea Alignment Score (IAScore) and Idea Distinctness Index. We further conducted human evaluation to assess the novelty, relevance, and feasibility of the generated future research ideas. This investigation offers insights into the evolving role of LLMs in idea generation, highlighting both its capability and limitations. Our work contributes to the ongoing efforts in evaluating and utilizing language models for generating future research ideas. We make our datasets and codes publicly available

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑