arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.14101cs.AIcs.LG

从学习到的因果网络中估计因果效应

Estimating Causal Effects from Learned Causal Networks

University of California, Irvine(加利福尼亚大学欧文分校);Iowa State University(爱荷华州立大学)

Anna Raichev, Alexander Ihler, Jin Tian, Rina Dechter

AI总结:

提出直接从观测数据学习因果贝叶斯网络及混杂潜变量并应用PGM算法的模型补全方法,在大型模型上比传统估计量方法更有效地回答因果效应查询。

摘要:

在给定因果图和观测数据时,回答可识别因果效应查询(如 $P(Y|do(X))$)的标准方法是先生成一个估计量,即在可观测变量上的概率表达式,随后使用观测数据对其进行评估。本文提出了一种替代范式,用于回答离散可观测变量上的因果效应查询。我们提议直接从观测数据中学习因果贝叶斯网络及其混杂的潜变量。然后,可将高效的概率图模型(PGM)算法应用于学习到的模型来回答查询。令人惊讶的是,我们展示了这种“模型补全”学习方法可能比估计量方法更有效,特别是对于估计量表达式变得难以计算的较大模型。我们使用贝叶斯网络的基准集合和合成生成的因果模型说明了该方法的潜力。

英文摘要:

The standard approach to answering an identifiable causal-effect query (e.g., $P(Y|do(X)$) when given a causal diagram and observational data is to first generate an estimand, or probabilistic expression over the observable variables, which is then evaluated using the observational data. In this paper, we propose an alternative paradigm for answering causal-effect queries over discrete observable variables. We propose to instead learn the causal Bayesian network and its confounding latent variables directly from the observational data. Then, efficient probabilistic graphical model (PGM) algorithms can be applied to the learned model to answer queries. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that this \emph{model completion} learning approach can be more effective than estimand approaches, particularly for larger models in which the estimand expressions become computationally difficult. We illustrate our method's potential using a benchmark collection of Bayesian networks and synthetically generated causal models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑