arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2408.13784cs.SDcs.AIcs.MMeess.AS
收藏

分析部分伪造语音信号中拼接伪影的影响

Analyzing the Impact of Splicing Artifacts in Partially Fake Speech Signals

Politecnico di Milano(米兰理工大学)

Viola Negroni, Davide Salvi, Paolo Bestagini, Stefano Tubaro

AI总结:

本研究分析了部分伪造语音信号中信号拼接引入的伪影,发现仅通过分析这些伪影即可在 PartialSpoof 和 HAD 数据集上分别实现 6.16% 和 7.36% 的检测等错误率(EER),无需训练检测器,揭示了现有数据集的潜在偏差并指明未来改进方向。

摘要:

语音深度伪造检测近期在多媒体取证社区中获得了显著关注。相关问题也已被探讨,例如部分伪造信号的识别,即包含真实和伪造语音片段的音轨。然而,生成高质量拼接音频并非看起来那么简单。拼接信号通常通过基础信号连接创建。此过程可能引入明显的伪影,使生成的数据更易被检测。我们分析了信号连接产生的拼接音轨,研究了其伪影,并评估这些伪影是否在现有数据集中引入偏差。研究发现,通过分析拼接伪影,我们分别在 PartialSpoof 和 HAD 数据集上实现了 6.16% 和 7.36% 的检测 EER,而无需训练任何检测器。这些结果凸显了生成可靠拼接音频数据的复杂性,并引发了有助于改进未来研究的讨论。

英文摘要:

Speech deepfake detection has recently gained significant attention within the multimedia forensics community. Related issues have also been explored, such as the identification of partially fake signals, i.e., tracks that include both real and fake speech segments. However, generating high-quality spliced audio is not as straightforward as it may appear. Spliced signals are typically created through basic signal concatenation. This process could introduce noticeable artifacts that can make the generated data easier to detect. We analyze spliced audio tracks resulting from signal concatenation, investigate their artifacts and assess whether such artifacts introduce any bias in existing datasets. Our findings reveal that by analyzing splicing artifacts, we can achieve a detection EER of 6.16% and 7.36% on PartialSpoof and HAD datasets, respectively, without needing to train any detector. These results underscore the complexities of generating reliable spliced audio data and lead to discussions that can help improve future research in this area.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑