arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.11392cs.CV

生物特征质量评估的公平性度量

Fairness measures for biometric quality assessment

Hochschule Darmstadt(达姆施塔特应用科学大学);Technical University of Denmark(丹麦技术大学)

André Dörsch, Torsten Schlett, Peter Munch, Christian Rathgeb, Christoph Busch

AI总结:

本文针对生物特征质量评估中跨人口统计学群体的质量分数差异问题,提出并比较了多种公平性度量方法,为该领域未来标准的制定提供了潜在候选方案。

摘要:

质量评估算法用于测量采集的生物特征样本的质量。由于样本质量强烈影响生物特征系统的识别性能,因此仅处理足够质量的样本并丢弃低质量样本至关重要。尽管质量评估算法并非旨在跨人口统计学群体产生差异很大的质量分数,但质量分数差异是有可能存在的,从而导致不同的丢弃率。为了确保质量评估算法在评估样本质量时不考虑人口统计学特征,进而确保质量算法对所有个体表现同等,开发一种公平性度量至关重要。在本研究中,我们提出并比较了多种用于评估跨人口统计学群体的质量组件的公平性度量。所提出的度量,可以作为这一重要领域即将出台的标准的潜在候选方案。

英文摘要:

Quality assessment algorithms measure the quality of a captured biometric sample. Since the sample quality strongly affects the recognition performance of a biometric system, it is essential to only process samples of sufficient quality and discard samples of low-quality. Even though quality assessment algorithms are not intended to yield very different quality scores across demographic groups, quality score discrepancies are possible, resulting in different discard ratios. To ensure that quality assessment algorithms do not take demographic characteristics into account when assessing sample quality and consequently to ensure that the quality algorithms perform equally for all individuals, it is crucial to develop a fairness measure. In this work we propose and compare multiple fairness measures for evaluating quality components across demographic groups. Proposed measures, could be used as potential candidates for an upcoming standard in this important field.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑