arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.11352hep-phnucl-th
收藏

有效拉氏量方法中的光产生反应 $\gamma p \to f_0(980) p$

Photoproduction $γp \to f_0(980) p$ in an effective Lagrangian approach

Neng-Chang Wei, Ai-Chao Wang, Fei Huang

AI总结:

基于有效拉氏量方法,分析LEPS2/BGOegg数据,发现$s$道$N(2040)3/2^+$或$N(2100)1/2^+$共振交换主导$\gamma p \to f_0(980) p$微分截面,并预言目标不对称性。

摘要:

在树级有效拉氏量方法中,分析了LEPS2/BGOegg合作组关于$\gamma p \to f_0(980) p$反应的最新的微分截面和光子束不对称性$\Sigma$数据。在构建反应振幅以重现数据时,考虑了$t$道$\rho$和$\omega$交换、$u$道和$s$道$N$交换、相互作用流以及可能的$s$道$N^*$交换。结果表明,为了描述LEPS2/BGOegg数据,$s$道中$N(2040)3/2^+$或$N(2100)1/2^+$共振交换的贡献是必需的,并且它们主导了$\gamma p \to f_0(980) p$的微分截面。进一步分析表明,$t$道$\rho$和$\omega$交换以及相互作用流对微分截面和光子束不对称性的贡献相当小,而$u$道$N$交换的贡献在模型中包含$N(2040)3/2^+$时相当可观,但在模型中包含$N(2100)1/2^+$时则可忽略。给出了$\gamma p \to f_0(980) p$的目标不对称性$T$的预言,这些预言可由未来的实验检验。

英文摘要:

The most recent data on differential cross sections and photon beam asymmetries $Σ$ from the LEPS2/BGOegg Collaboration for the $γp \to f_0(980) p$ reaction are analyzed within a tree-level effective Lagrangian approach. The $t$-channel $ρ$ and $ω$ exchanges, the $u$- and $s$-channel $N$ exchanges, the interaction current, and the possible $s$-channel $N^*$ exchanges are taken into account in constructing the reaction amplitudes to reproduce the data. The results show that the contributions from either the $N(2040)3/2^+$ or the $N(2100)1/2^+$ resonance exchange in the $s$ channel are necessarily required to describe the LEPS2/BGOegg data and they dominate the differential cross sections of $γp \to f_0(980) p$. Further analysis shows that the contributions from the $t$-channel $ρ$ and $ω$ exchanges and the interaction current are rather small to both differential cross sections and photo beam asymmetries, and the contributions from $u$-channel $N$ exchange are considerable in the case of including $N(2040)3/2^+$ in the model while negligible in the case of including $N(2100)1/2^+$ in the model. Predictions of target asymmetries $T$ for $γp \to f_0(980) p$ are given, which can be examined by future experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑