arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.10433cs.CV

CLIP-DPO:视觉语言模型作为修复LVLM幻觉的偏好来源

CLIP-DPO: Vision-Language Models as a Source of Preference for Fixing Hallucinations in LVLMs

Samsung AI Center Cambridge(三星人工智能中心剑桥分部);Queen Mary University of London(伦敦玛丽女王大学)

Yassine Ouali, Adrian Bulat, Brais Martinez, Georgios Tzimiropoulos

AI总结:

提出CLIP-DPO方法,利用CLIP的偏好信号优化LVLM,无需额外数据或API,显著减少幻觉并保持基准性能。

摘要:

尽管近期取得了成功,但LVLM(大型视觉语言模型)容易产生幻觉,例如虚构物体及其属性或关系等细节,这限制了其在实际应用中的部署。为了解决这一问题并提高其鲁棒性,我们提出了CLIP-DPO,一种偏好优化方法,利用对比预训练的视觉语言(VL)嵌入模型(如CLIP)进行基于DPO的LVLM优化。与先前解决LVLM幻觉的工作不同,我们的方法不依赖付费API,也不需要额外的训练数据或部署其他外部LVLM。相反,从初始的监督微调数据池出发,我们生成多样化的预测,并根据其CLIP图像-文本相似度进行排序,然后使用基于规则的稳健过滤方法,获得用于DPO训练的正负样本对。我们将CLIP-DPO微调应用于MobileVLM-v2系列模型和LlaVA-1.5,在所有情况下,与基线模型相比,幻觉减少方面均观察到显著改进。我们还观察到零样本分类性能更好,表明接地能力有所提升,并验证了在标准LVLM基准上的原始性能总体得以保持。

英文摘要:

Despite recent successes, LVLMs or Large Vision Language Models are prone to hallucinating details like objects and their properties or relations, limiting their real-world deployment. To address this and improve their robustness, we present CLIP-DPO, a preference optimization method that leverages contrastively pre-trained Vision-Language (VL) embedding models, such as CLIP, for DPO-based optimization of LVLMs. Unlike prior works tackling LVLM hallucinations, our method does not rely on paid-for APIs, and does not require additional training data or the deployment of other external LVLMs. Instead, starting from the initial pool of supervised fine-tuning data, we generate a diverse set of predictions, which are ranked based on their CLIP image-text similarities, and then filtered using a robust rule-based approach to obtain a set of positive and negative pairs for DPO-based training. We applied CLIP-DPO fine-tuning to the MobileVLM-v2 family of models and to LlaVA-1.5, in all cases observing significant improvements in terms of hallucination reduction over baseline models. We also observe better performance for zero-shot classification, suggesting improved grounding capabilities, and verify that the original performance on standard LVLM benchmarks is overall preserved.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑