arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2408.08751cs.CVeess.IV

生成模型对比分析:利用VAEs、GANs和Stable Diffusion增强图像合成

Comparative Analysis of Generative Models: Enhancing Image Synthesis with VAEs, GANs, and Stable Diffusion

Huddersfield University(哈德斯菲尔德大学)

Sanchayan Vivekananthan

AI总结:

本文对比分析VAEs、GANs、Stable Diffusion三类生成模型的优劣,探索结合Grounding DINO与Grounded SAM优化Stable Diffusion的图像精度,为场景选型和后续研究提供参考。

摘要:

本文研究了三种主流生成建模框架:变分自编码器(Variational Autoencoders, VAEs)、生成对抗网络(Generative Adversarial Networks, GANs)以及Stable Diffusion模型。VAEs在学习隐空间表示方面效果显著,但生成结果常较为模糊;GANs能够生成逼真图像,但存在模式崩溃等问题;Stable Diffusion模型可生成语义连贯性强的高质量图像,不过对计算资源要求较高。此外,本文探索了将Grounding DINO和Grounded SAM与Stable Diffusion结合,通过先进的分割与图像修复技术提升图像准确性。该分析为不同应用场景下的模型选择提供指导,并指明了未来研究方向。

英文摘要:

This paper examines three major generative modelling frameworks: Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and Stable Diffusion models. VAEs are effective at learning latent representations but frequently yield blurry results. GANs can generate realistic images but face issues such as mode collapse. Stable Diffusion models, while producing high-quality images with strong semantic coherence, are demanding in terms of computational resources. Additionally, the paper explores how incorporating Grounding DINO and Grounded SAM with Stable Diffusion improves image accuracy by utilising sophisticated segmentation and inpainting techniques. The analysis guides on selecting suitable models for various applications and highlights areas for further research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑