arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.05697eess.IVcs.CV

评估BM3D和NBNet:跨多数据集的图像去噪综合研究

Evaluating BM3D and NBNet: A Comprehensive Study of Image Denoising Across Multiple Datasets

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering(电气与计算机工程学院);Georgia Institute of Technology(佐治亚理工学院)

Ghazal Kaviani, Reza Marzban, Ghassan AlRegib

AI总结:

本文比较传统非学习型BM3D与现代学习型NBNet在多数据集上的图像去噪效果,发现BM3D擅长模糊场景、NBNet更适用于复杂噪声环境,为不同场景去噪策略选择提供参考。

摘要:

本文研究图像去噪,比较以块匹配3D(BM3D)为代表的传统非学习型技术与以NBNet为代表的现代学习型方法。我们在多种数据集上评估这些方法,包括CURE-OR、CURE-TSR、SSID+、Set-12和胸部X光片,每个数据集都存在独特的噪声挑战。我们的分析采用7个图像质量评估(IQA)指标,并考察其对目标检测性能的影响。研究发现,BM3D在模糊挑战等场景中表现出色,而NBNet在欠曝光和过曝光等复杂噪声环境中更有效。本研究揭示了每种方法的优缺点,为不同现实应用中不同去噪策略的有效性提供了见解。

英文摘要:

This paper investigates image denoising, comparing traditional non-learning-based techniques, represented by Block-Matching 3D (BM3D), with modern learning-based methods, exemplified by NBNet. We assess these approaches across diverse datasets, including CURE-OR, CURE-TSR, SSID+, Set-12, and Chest-Xray, each presenting unique noise challenges. Our analysis employs seven Image Quality Assessment (IQA) metrics and examines the impact on object detection performance. We find that while BM3D excels in scenarios like blur challenges, NBNet is more effective in complex noise environments such as under-exposure and over-exposure. The study reveals the strengths and limitations of each method, providing insights into the effectiveness of different denoising strategies in varied real-world applications.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑