arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.01663quant-ph
收藏

关于测量魔幻资源困难度的研究

On the Hardness of Measuring Magic

Roy J. Garcia, Gaurav Bhole, Kaifeng Bu, Liyuan Chen, Haribabu Arthanari, Arthur Jaffe

AI总结:

本文引入泡利不稳定性作为魔幻度量,并在IBM Eagle处理器上实验测量,证明大规模魔幻测量在计算上不可行,揭示量子加速与魔幻可测性之间的根本矛盾。

摘要:

量子计算机有望比经典计算机显著更快地解决计算问题。这些“加速”是通过利用一种称为魔幻(magic)的资源实现的。测量设备所使用的魔幻量使我们能够量化其潜在的计算能力。没有这一特性,量子计算机并不比经典计算机更快。魔幻能否在大规模量子计算机上被准确测量一直是一个悬而未决的问题。为了解决这一问题,我们引入泡利不稳定性(Pauli instability)作为魔幻的度量,并在IBM Eagle量子处理器上对其进行了实验测量。我们证明,测量大量(即广延量)魔幻在计算上是不可行的。我们的结果表明,只有当量子计算机不提供加速时,人们才可能测量魔幻。我们用理论和实验证据支持我们的结论。我们的工作展示了量子技术在测量量子计算中最重要的资源之一方面的能力与局限性。

英文摘要:

Quantum computers promise to solve computational problems significantly faster than classical computers. These 'speed-ups' are achieved by utilizing a resource known as magic. Measuring the amount of magic used by a device allows us to quantify its potential computational power. Without this property, quantum computers are no faster than classical computers. Whether magic can be accurately measured on large-scale quantum computers has remained an open problem. To address this question, we introduce Pauli instability as a measure of magic and experimentally measure it on the IBM Eagle quantum processor. We prove that measuring large (i.e., extensive) quantities of magic is intractable. Our results suggest that one may only measure magic when a quantum computer does not provide a speed-up. We support our conclusions with both theoretical and experimental evidence. Our work illustrates the capabilities and limitations of quantum technology in measuring one of the most important resources in quantum computation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑