arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.01433cs.CVcs.ET
收藏

评估与增强大语言模型在感知任务中的可信度

Evaluating and Enhancing Trustworthiness of LLMs in Perception Tasks

University of Gothenburg(哥德堡大学);Chalmers University of Technology(查尔姆斯理工大学)

Malsha Ashani Mahawatta Dona, Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel, Yinan Yu, Christian Berger

AI总结:

本文面向车载多模态LLM的行人检测与定位,评估GPT-4V和LLaVA的幻觉检测策略,发现专有模型更优、BO3投票效果有限,而引入历史信息可改善检测结果。

摘要:

如今,自适应巡航控制或追尾碰撞预警等先进驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)正被更广泛地应用于各类车辆。将此类能够处理文本、图像、音频及其他数据类型的先进多模态大语言模型(LLM)集成到车载端,可能具有大幅提升乘客舒适度的潜力。然而,LLM的幻觉仍是一个有待解决的重大挑战。本文以行人检测与定位为例,在基于视觉的数据中的目标检测场景下,系统评估了此类LLM可能采用的幻觉检测策略。我们在两个数据集(Waymo/美国和PREPER CITY/瑞典)上,对应用于两款最先进LLM(专有模型GPT-4V和开放模型LLaVA)的三种幻觉检测策略进行了评估。结果表明,这些LLM能够以令人印象深刻的细节程度描述交通状况,但在目标定位等进一步分析活动中仍面临挑战。我们以行人检测为例,评估并扩展了将这些LLM应用于视频序列时的幻觉检测方法。实验表明,目前最先进的专有LLM表现远优于开放LLM。此外,基于投票的一致性增强技术(例如Best-of-Three(BO3)方法)无法有效降低在检测行人时往往表现出较高假阴性率的LLM的幻觉。然而,通过纳入来自过去的信息来扩展幻觉检测,有助于改善结果。

英文摘要:

Today's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), like adaptive cruise control or rear collision warning, are finding broader adoption across vehicle classes. Integrating such advanced, multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) on board a vehicle, which are capable of processing text, images, audio, and other data types, may have the potential to greatly enhance passenger comfort. Yet, an LLM's hallucinations are still a major challenge to be addressed. In this paper, we systematically assessed potential hallucination detection strategies for such LLMs in the context of object detection in vision-based data on the example of pedestrian detection and localization. We evaluate three hallucination detection strategies applied to two state-of-the-art LLMs, the proprietary GPT-4V and the open LLaVA, on two datasets (Waymo/US and PREPER CITY/Sweden). Our results show that these LLMs can describe a traffic situation to an impressive level of detail but are still challenged for further analysis activities such as object localization. We evaluate and extend hallucination detection approaches when applying these LLMs to video sequences in the example of pedestrian detection. Our experiments show that, at the moment, the state-of-the-art proprietary LLM performs much better than the open LLM. Furthermore, consistency enhancement techniques based on voting, such as the Best-of-Three (BO3) method, do not effectively reduce hallucinations in LLMs that tend to exhibit high false negatives in detecting pedestrians. However, extending the hallucination detection by including information from the past helps to improve results.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑