arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.00312cs.IRcs.CRcs.LGcs.SI

面向文本感知推荐系统的对抗性文本重写

Adversarial Text Rewriting for Text-aware Recommender Systems

Georgia Institute of Technology(佐治亚理工学院)

Sejoon Oh, Gaurav Verma, Srijan Kumar

AI总结:

本文提出对抗性文本重写框架,通过两阶段微调和上下文学习攻击文本感知推荐系统,验证恶意卖方可在描述保持自然的同时不公平提升商品排名。

摘要:

文本感知推荐系统融合标题和描述等丰富文本特征,以为用户生成物品推荐。文本特征的使用有助于缓解冷启动问题,因此这类推荐系统受到了越来越多的关注。然而,我们认为,对物品描述的依赖使推荐系统容易受到电商平台上恶意卖家的操纵。本文中,我们通过提出一种新的文本重写框架来攻击文本感知推荐系统,探究了此类操纵的可能性。我们表明,卖家可以利用重写攻击不公平地提升其商品排名,即使经过对抗性重写的描述在人类评估者看来是真实自然的。在方法上,我们研究了实施文本重写攻击的两种不同变体:(1)用于获得更强攻击性能的两阶段微调;(2)用于获得更高文本重写质量的上下文学习。在3个不同数据集和4种现有方法上进行的实验表明,推荐系统对所提出的文本重写攻击表现出脆弱性。我们的工作补充了围绕推荐系统鲁棒性的现有文献,同时强调了大规模自动化文本生成时代中一个新的脆弱性维度。

英文摘要:

Text-aware recommender systems incorporate rich textual features, such as titles and descriptions, to generate item recommendations for users. The use of textual features helps mitigate cold-start problems, and thus, such recommender systems have attracted increased attention. However, we argue that the dependency on item descriptions makes the recommender system vulnerable to manipulation by adversarial sellers on e-commerce platforms. In this paper, we explore the possibility of such manipulation by proposing a new text rewriting framework to attack text-aware recommender systems. We show that the rewriting attack can be exploited by sellers to unfairly uprank their products, even though the adversarially rewritten descriptions are perceived as realistic by human evaluators. Methodologically, we investigate two different variations to carry out text rewriting attacks: (1) two-phase fine-tuning for greater attack performance, and (2) in-context learning for higher text rewriting quality. Experiments spanning 3 different datasets and 4 existing approaches demonstrate that recommender systems exhibit vulnerability against the proposed text rewriting attack. Our work adds to the existing literature around the robustness of recommender systems, while highlighting a new dimension of vulnerability in the age of large-scale automated text generation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑