arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.17697cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

用于单标签多类分类任务概率评估的优越评分规则

Superior Scoring Rules for Probabilistic Evaluation of Single-Label Multi-Class Classification Tasks

Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)(阿米尔卡比尔理工大学(德黑兰理工大学));University of Exeter(埃克塞特大学)

Rouhollah Ahmadian, Mehdi Ghatee, Johan Wahlström

AI总结:

提出PBS和PLL两种新型评分规则,通过引入对错误分类的惩罚改进概率分类评估,在满足严格评分属性的同时优先奖励正确预测,有效提升模型选择与早停效果并实现更高的F1分数。

摘要:

本研究引入了名为Penalized Brier Score (PBS) 和 Penalized Logarithmic Loss (PLL) 的新型优越评分规则,以改进概率分类的模型评估。像 Brier Score 和 Logarithmic Loss 这样的传统评分规则,有时会为错误分类分配比正确分类更好的分数。这种与实际偏好奖励正确分类的偏差可能导致次优的模型选择。通过整合对错误分类的惩罚,PBS 和 PLL 修改了传统的严格评分规则,以始终为正确预测分配更好的分数。形式化证明表明,PBS 和 PLL 满足严格评分规则属性,同时优先奖励准确分类。实验展示了使用 PBS 和 PLL 进行模型选择、模型检查点和早停的益处。在训练期间,与 Brier Score 相比,PBS 与 F1 分数表现出更高的负相关性。因此,PBS 能更有效地识别最优检查点和早停点,从而带来更高的 F1 分数。比较分析验证了由 PBS 和 PLL 选择的模型实现了更优的 F1 分数。因此,PBS 和 PLL 通过涵盖严格评分原则和对真实分类的明确偏好,弥合了不确定性量化与准确率最大化之间的差距。所提出的指标可以增强可靠概率分类的模型评估和选择。

英文摘要:

This study introduces novel superior scoring rules called Penalized Brier Score (PBS) and Penalized Logarithmic Loss (PLL) to improve model evaluation for probabilistic classification. Traditional scoring rules like Brier Score and Logarithmic Loss sometimes assign better scores to misclassifications in comparison with correct classifications. This discrepancy from the actual preference for rewarding correct classifications can lead to suboptimal model selection. By integrating penalties for misclassifications, PBS and PLL modify traditional proper scoring rules to consistently assign better scores to correct predictions. Formal proofs demonstrate that PBS and PLL satisfy strictly proper scoring rule properties while also preferentially rewarding accurate classifications. Experiments showcase the benefits of using PBS and PLL for model selection, model checkpointing, and early stopping. PBS exhibits a higher negative correlation with the F1 score compared to the Brier Score during training. Thus, PBS more effectively identifies optimal checkpoints and early stopping points, leading to improved F1 scores. Comparative analysis verifies models selected by PBS and PLL achieve superior F1 scores. Therefore, PBS and PLL address the gap between uncertainty quantification and accuracy maximization by encapsulating both proper scoring principles and explicit preference for true classifications. The proposed metrics can enhance model evaluation and selection for reliable probabilistic classification.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑