arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.12968cs.SI
收藏

多平台框架分析:克里斯蒂安桑焚烧《古兰经》案例研究

Multi-Platform Framing Analysis: A Case Study of Kristiansand Quran Burning

Anna-Katharina Jung, Gautam Kishore Shahi, Jennifer Fromm, Kari Anne Røysland, Kim Henrik Gronert

AI总结:

本研究对推特、YouTube和传统媒体进行多平台框架分析,揭示克里斯蒂安桑焚烧《古兰经》事件中在线新闻强调合法性、社交媒体聚焦道德性,并发现YouTube最封闭、推特最开放。

摘要:

在错误信息和两极分化的时代,各种媒体和话语空间中的事件框架至关重要。然而,许多研究局限于特定媒体或网络,忽视了跨平台传播的重要性。本研究通过在多平台框架分析中考察推特、YouTube和传统媒体,克服了这一局限,分析了2019年挪威克里斯蒂安桑发生的焚烧《古兰经》事件。研究审视了媒体和政策框架,并通过共享URL揭示了网络连接。研究结果表明,在线新闻强调该事件的合法性,而社交媒体则关注其道德性,且YouTube评论中充斥着严厉的仇恨言论。此外,YouTube被认定为最自成一体的社区,而推特则最开放于外部输入。

英文摘要:

The framing of events in various media and discourse spaces is crucial in the era of misinformation and polarization. Many studies, however, are limited to specific media or networks, disregarding the importance of cross-platform diffusion. This study overcomes that limitation by conducting a multi-platform framing analysis on Twitter, YouTube, and traditional media analyzing the 2019 Koran burning in Kristiansand, Norway. It examines media and policy frames and uncovers network connections through shared URLs. The findings show that online news emphasizes the incident's legality, while social media focuses on its morality, with harsh hate speech prevalent in YouTube comments. Additionally, YouTube is identified as the most self-contained community, whereas Twitter is the most open to external inputs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑