arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.08970cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

自解释对抗图像

Self-interpreting Adversarial Images

Cornell Tech(康奈尔科技);University of Massachusetts Amherst(马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校)

Tingwei Zhang, Collin Zhang, John X. Morris, Eugene Bagdasarian, Vitaly Shmatikov

AI总结:

本研究提出针对视觉语言模型的新型跨模态注入攻击,生成含隐藏元指令的自解释对抗图像,可引导模型输出符合攻击者目标,评估了攻击效果并讨论了潜在危害与防御方向。

摘要:

我们提出了一种针对视觉语言模型的新型间接跨模态注入攻击,可生成自解释图像。这类图像包含隐藏的“元指令”,能控制模型回答用户关于图像的问题时的方式,引导模型输出表达攻击者选定的风格、情感或观点。自解释图像充当软提示,在让模型仍基于图像视觉内容生成答案的同时,约束模型满足攻击者的(元)目标,因此元指令是一种更强的提示注入形式。对抗图像看起来自然,模型的回答连贯合理,但仍遵循攻击者选定的解读方向,例如政治倾向性引导,甚至能实现显式文本指令无法达成的目标。我们在多种模型、解读方向和用户提示下评估了自解释图像的攻击效果,阐述了这类攻击可能通过生成携带垃圾信息、虚假信息或倾向性引导的自解释内容造成危害,最后讨论了防御方法。

英文摘要:

We introduce a new type of indirect, cross-modal injection attacks against visual language models that enable creation of self-interpreting images. These images contain hidden "meta-instructions" that control how models answer users' questions about the image and steer models' outputs to express an adversary-chosen style, sentiment, or point of view. Self-interpreting images act as soft prompts, conditioning the model to satisfy the adversary's (meta-)objective while still producing answers based on the image's visual content. Meta-instructions are thus a stronger form of prompt injection. Adversarial images look natural and the model's answers are coherent and plausible, yet they also follow the adversary-chosen interpretation, e.g., political spin, or even objectives that are not achievable with explicit text instructions. We evaluate the efficacy of self-interpreting images for a variety of models, interpretations, and user prompts. We describe how these attacks could cause harm by enabling creation of self-interpreting content that carries spam, misinformation, or spin. Finally, we discuss defenses.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑