arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2407.08029cs.LGcs.CL
收藏

大语言模型因果推理基准的批判性综述

A Critical Review of Causal Reasoning Benchmarks for Large Language Models

University of Oxford(牛津大学)

Linying Yang, Vik Shirvaikar, Oscar Clivio, Fabian Falck

AI总结:

该综述梳理大语言模型因果推理基准的现状,指出多数基准可通过知识检索解答的问题,总结近期基准纳入干预/反事实推理的进展,提出有效基准应满足的标准,为基准设计与因果理解评估框架构建提供方向。

摘要:

目前已有大量基准(benchmark)旨在评估大语言模型(LLM)的因果推断与推理能力。但其中许多基准很可能可以通过领域知识检索来解答,这让人们质疑它们是否达成了设计目标。本综述全面梳理了面向因果性的LLM基准,重点阐述了近期基准如何通过纳入干预推理或反事实推理,朝着更严谨的因果推理定义推进。我们还提出了一套有用的基准或基准集应当力求满足的标准。本研究有望为构建LLM因果理解评估的通用框架、设计新型基准铺平道路。

英文摘要:

Numerous benchmarks aim to evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for causal inference and reasoning. However, many of them can likely be solved through the retrieval of domain knowledge, questioning whether they achieve their purpose. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of LLM benchmarks for causality. We highlight how recent benchmarks move towards a more thorough definition of causal reasoning by incorporating interventional or counterfactual reasoning. We derive a set of criteria that a useful benchmark or set of benchmarks should aim to satisfy. We hope this work will pave the way towards a general framework for the assessment of causal understanding in LLMs and the design of novel benchmarks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑