雅盖隆大学文化遗产项目丰富互操作元数据
Rich Interoperable Metadata for Cultural Heritage Projects at Jagiellonian University
AI总结：
针对MARC 21和都柏林核心等标准灵活性不足导致丰富元数据无处存储的问题，本文总结了雅盖隆大学文化遗产元数据映射研究，提出实现最大互操作性的要求，并计划通过实验验证映射可行性。
摘要：
如今为图书馆存储对象创建的丰富元数据无处可存，因为核心标准，即MARC 21和都柏林核心，不够灵活。本文旨在总结我们在雅盖隆大学（JU）文化遗产对象研究中解决这一问题的进行中工作。我们将JU目前收集的对象元数据（以手稿、海报和讣告为例）与文化遗产界使用的五种广泛元数据标准进行了比较：都柏林核心、EAD、MODS、EDM和Digital Scriptorium。我们的初步结果表明，它们之间的映射确实存在问题，但我们确定了在JU文化遗产元数据模式的进一步工作中应遵循的要求，以实现最大互操作性。随着我们前进，基于概念模型的连续版本，我们将进行实验，以验证这些映射的实际可行性以及所提模型在多大程度上真正实现与这些各种元数据格式数据的集成。
英文摘要：
The rich metadata created nowadays for objects stored in libraries has nowhere to be stored, because core standards, namely MARC 21 and Dublin Core, are not flexible enough. The aim of this paper is to summarize our work-in-progress on tackling this problem in research on cultural heritage objects at the Jagiellonian University (JU). We compared the objects' metadata currently being collected at the JU (with examples of manuscript, placard, and obituary) with five widespread metadata standards used by the cultural heritage community: Dublin Core, EAD, MODS, EDM and Digital Scriptorium. Our preliminary results showed that mapping between them is indeed problematic, but we identified requirements that should be followed in further work on the JU cultural heritage metadata schema in order to achieve maximum interoperability. As we move forward, based on the successive versions of the conceptual model, we will conduct experiments to validate the practical feasibility of these mappings and the degree to which the proposed model will actually enable integration with data in these various metadata formats.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
