arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.04459cs.CL
收藏

通才与专才:评估面向乌尔都语的大语言模型

Generalists vs. Specialists: Evaluating Large Language Models for Urdu

Lahore University of Management Sciences(拉合尔管理科学大学);EMBL European Bioinformatics Institute(欧洲分子生物学实验室欧洲生物信息研究所)

Samee Arif, Abdul Hameed Azeemi, Agha Ali Raza, Awais Athar

AI总结:

本文通过七项分类与七项生成任务对比通用和专用大语言模型在乌尔都语上的表现,发现专用模型持续更优,且 GPT-4-Turbo 的生成评估更接近人工评估。

摘要:

在本文中,我们将通用模型 GPT-4-Turbo 和 Llama-3-8b 与经过特定任务微调的专用模型——XLM-Roberta-large、mT5-large 和 Llama-3-8b——进行比较。我们聚焦于七个分类任务和七个生成任务,以评估这些模型在乌尔都语上的表现。乌尔都语拥有 7000 万母语使用者,但在自然语言处理(NLP)中仍然代表性不足。尽管大语言模型(LLMs)频繁取得进展,但它们在包括乌尔都语在内的低资源语言中的表现仍待探索。我们还对生成任务进行了人工评估,并将结果与 GPT-4-Turbo、Llama-3-8b 和 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 所执行的评估进行比较。我们发现,专用模型在各类任务上持续优于通用模型。我们还发现,与 Llama-3-8b 所执行的评估相比,GPT-4-Turbo 对生成任务的评估与人工评估更为一致。本文通过提供关于通用和专用 LLMs 在低资源语言中有效性的见解,为 NLP 社区做出了贡献。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we compare general-purpose models, GPT-4-Turbo and Llama-3-8b, with special-purpose models--XLM-Roberta-large, mT5-large, and Llama-3-8b--that have been fine-tuned on specific tasks. We focus on seven classification and seven generation tasks to evaluate the performance of these models on Urdu language. Urdu has 70 million native speakers, yet it remains underrepresented in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Despite the frequent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), their performance in low-resource languages, including Urdu, still needs to be explored. We also conduct a human evaluation for the generation tasks and compare the results with the evaluations performed by GPT-4-Turbo, Llama-3-8b and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. We find that special-purpose models consistently outperform general-purpose models across various tasks. We also find that the evaluation done by GPT-4-Turbo for generation tasks aligns more closely with human evaluation compared to the evaluation the evaluation done by Llama-3-8b. This paper contributes to the NLP community by providing insights into the effectiveness of general and specific-purpose LLMs for low-resource languages.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑