arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.19087cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGq-bio.QM

深度神经网络与人类表征对齐的潜在维度

Dimensions underlying the representational alignment of deep neural networks with humans

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences(马克斯·普朗克人类认知与脑科学研究所);Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour(唐德斯脑、认知与行为研究所);Technische Universität Berlin(柏林工业大学);Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data (BIFOLD)(柏林学习与数据基础研究所);Justus Liebig University(尤斯图斯·李比希大学);Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, Universities of Marburg, Giessen, and Darmstadt(马尔堡、吉森和达姆施塔特大学心智、大脑与行为中心);Google DeepMind(谷歌DeepMind)

Florian P. Mahner, Lukas Muttenthaler, Umut Güçlü, Martin N. Hebart

AI总结:

本文提出一种基于潜在表征维度的通用框架,用于比较人类与深度神经网络(DNN)的图像表征,发现DNN中视觉维度主导语义维度,与人类存在显著差异,并揭示了表征对齐中的关键挑战。

摘要:

确定人类与人工智能(AI)之间的异同是计算认知神经科学和机器学习领域的一个重要目标,有望促进对人类认知的更深入理解,并推动更安全、更可靠的AI系统发展。以往许多比较人类与AI表征的研究依赖于全局标量度量来量化其对齐程度。然而,在没有明确假设的情况下,这些度量仅告知我们对齐的程度,而非决定对齐的因素。为应对这一挑战,我们提出一个通用框架,通过识别两个领域中相同行为背后的潜在表征维度来比较人类与AI的表征。将该框架应用于人类和自然图像的深度神经网络(DNN)模型,揭示了低维DNN嵌入同时包含视觉和语义维度。与人类相比,DNN表现出视觉属性对语义属性的明显主导,表明其在图像表征策略上的分歧。虽然计算机模拟实验显示DNN维度具有看似一致的可解释性,但人类与DNN表征的直接比较揭示了它们在图像处理方式上的显著差异。通过使表征可直接比较,我们的结果揭示了表征对齐的重要挑战,并提供了一种提高其可比性的方法。

英文摘要:

Determining the similarities and differences between humans and artificial intelligence (AI) is an important goal both in computational cognitive neuroscience and machine learning, promising a deeper understanding of human cognition and safer, more reliable AI systems. Much previous work comparing representations in humans and AI has relied on global, scalar measures to quantify their alignment. However, without explicit hypotheses, these measures only inform us about the degree of alignment, not the factors that determine it. To address this challenge, we propose a generic framework to compare human and AI representations, based on identifying latent representational dimensions underlying the same behavior in both domains. Applying this framework to humans and a deep neural network (DNN) model of natural images revealed a low-dimensional DNN embedding of both visual and semantic dimensions. In contrast to humans, DNNs exhibited a clear dominance of visual over semantic properties, indicating divergent strategies for representing images. While in-silico experiments showed seemingly consistent interpretability of DNN dimensions, a direct comparison between human and DNN representations revealed substantial differences in how they process images. By making representations directly comparable, our results reveal important challenges for representational alignment and offer a means for improving their comparability.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑