arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2406.17430cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS

探究大型多模态模型中语音特定风险:分类体系、基准与洞察

Towards Probing Speech-Specific Risks in Large Multimodal Models: A Taxonomy, Benchmark, and Insights

Monash University(莫纳什大学)

Hao Yang, Lizhen Qu, Ehsan Shareghi, Gholamreza Haffari

AI总结:

本文提出了一种针对语音特定风险的分类体系,涵盖8类风险,并构建了小规模数据集评估大型多模态模型,发现最新模型在检测语音副语言风险上表现不佳。

摘要:

大型多模态模型(LMMs)近期取得了巨大成功,展现出理解多模态信息及与人类用户交互的强大能力。尽管取得了进展,但在多模态设置中,特别是语音模态中检测高风险交互的挑战,在很大程度上仍未被探索。针对语音模态风险的传统研究主要强调内容(例如,转录所捕获的信息)。然而,在基于语音的交互中,音频中的副语言线索会显著改变话语背后的预期含义。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种语音特定的风险分类体系,涵盖了敌意(恶意讽刺和威胁)、恶意模仿(年龄、性别、种族)和刻板偏见(年龄、性别、种族)下的 8 种风险类别。基于该分类体系,我们创建了一个小规模数据集,用于评估当前 LMMs 检测这些类别风险的能力。我们观察到,即使是最新模型在检测语音中各种副语言特定风险方面仍然无效(例如,Gemini 1.5 Pro 的表现仅略高于随机基准)。警告:本文包含偏见和冒犯性示例。

英文摘要:

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have achieved great success recently, demonstrating a strong capability to understand multimodal information and to interact with human users. Despite the progress made, the challenge of detecting high-risk interactions in multimodal settings, and in particular in speech modality, remains largely unexplored. Conventional research on risk for speech modality primarily emphasises the content (e.g., what is captured as transcription). However, in speech-based interactions, paralinguistic cues in audio can significantly alter the intended meaning behind utterances. In this work, we propose a speech-specific risk taxonomy, covering 8 risk categories under hostility (malicious sarcasm and threats), malicious imitation (age, gender, ethnicity), and stereotypical biases (age, gender, ethnicity). Based on the taxonomy, we create a small-scale dataset for evaluating current LMMs capability in detecting these categories of risk. We observe even the latest models remain ineffective to detect various paralinguistic-specific risks in speech (e.g., Gemini 1.5 Pro is performing only slightly above random baseline). Warning: this paper contains biased and offensive examples.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑