arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2406.16964cs.LGcs.AI

语言模型对时间序列预测真的有用吗?

Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting?

University of Virginia(弗吉尼亚大学);University of Washington(华盛顿大学)

Mingtian Tan, Mike A. Merrill, Vinayak Gupta, Tim Althoff, Thomas Hartvigsen

AI总结:

通过对三种流行 LLM 时间序列预测方法做消融,本文发现移除或替换 LLM 不降低甚至提升性能,质疑 LLM 在该任务中的实际价值。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)正被应用于时间序列预测。但语言模型对时间序列真的有用吗?在对近期三种流行的基于 LLM 的时间序列预测方法进行的一系列消融研究中,我们发现移除 LLM 组件或将其替换为基本注意力层并不会降低预测性能——在大多数情况下,结果甚至有所改善!我们还发现,尽管预训练 LLM 的计算成本很高,但其表现并不优于从头训练的模型,不能表示时间序列中的序列依赖关系,也无法在少样本设置中提供帮助。此外,我们探索了时间序列编码器,发现 patching 和注意力结构的表现与基于 LLM 的预测器相似。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) are being applied to time series forecasting. But are language models actually useful for time series? In a series of ablation studies on three recent and popular LLM-based time series forecasting methods, we find that removing the LLM component or replacing it with a basic attention layer does not degrade forecasting performance -- in most cases, the results even improve! We also find that despite their significant computational cost, pretrained LLMs do no better than models trained from scratch, do not represent the sequential dependencies in time series, and do not assist in few-shot settings. Additionally, we explore time series encoders and find that patching and attention structures perform similarly to LLM-based forecasters.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑