arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2406.09073cs.LG
收藏

我们在遗忘研究中取得进展了吗?首届 NeurIPS 遗忘竞赛的发现

Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition

Google DeepMind(谷歌DeepMind);Google Research(谷歌研究院);University of Warwick(华威大学);University of Barcelona(巴塞罗那大学);Computer Vision Center(计算机视觉中心);University of Montreal(蒙特利尔大学);ChaLearn;Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院自动化研究所);Université Paris Saclay(巴黎萨克雷大学)
Eleni Triantafillou, Peter Kairouz, Fabian Pedregosa, Jamie Hayes, Meghdad Kurmanji, Kairan Zhao, Vincent Dumoulin, Julio Jacques Junior, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Ju… 展开作者

Eleni Triantafillou, Peter Kairouz, Fabian Pedregosa, Jamie Hayes, Meghdad Kurmanji, Kairan Zhao, Vincent Dumoulin, Julio Jacques Junior, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Jun Wan, Lisheng Sun Hosoya, Sergio Escalera, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Peter Triantafillou, Isabelle Guyon

AI总结:

本文总结首届 NeurIPS 遗忘竞赛成果,分析顶尖方案与评估框架,发现遗忘研究取得进展且领先方法排名稳定,为降低评估成本和推进基准测试及算法开发提供方向。

摘要:

我们呈现了首届 NeurIPS 遗忘竞赛的发现,该竞赛旨在推动新算法的开发,并启动关于正式且稳健评估方法的讨论。竞赛取得了巨大成功:来自全球近 1,200 支队伍参与其中,贡献了大量新颖且富有想象力、具有不同特性的解决方案。在本文中,我们分析了排名靠前的解决方案,并深入探讨了遗忘基准测试这一本身即构成研究问题的话题。我们为竞赛开发的评估方法依据遗忘的正式定义来衡量遗忘质量,同时纳入模型效用以实现整体评估。我们分析了该评估框架不同实例化方式相对于相关计算成本的有效性,并讨论了标准化评估的影响。我们发现,在该框架的若干变体下,领先方法的排名保持稳定,这为降低评估成本指明了途径。总体而言,我们的发现表明遗忘研究取得了进展,在我们的评估框架下,表现最佳的竞赛参赛方案超越了现有算法。我们分析了不同算法所做的权衡,以及它们在新数据集泛化能力方面的优势与不足,为在这一重要领域推进基准测试和算法开发铺平了道路。

英文摘要:

We present the findings of the first NeurIPS competition on unlearning, which sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms and initiate discussions on formal and robust evaluation methodologies. The competition was highly successful: nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated, and a wealth of novel, imaginative solutions with different characteristics were contributed. In this paper, we analyze top solutions and delve into discussions on benchmarking unlearning, which itself is a research problem. The evaluation methodology we developed for the competition measures forgetting quality according to a formal notion of unlearning, while incorporating model utility for a holistic evaluation. We analyze the effectiveness of different instantiations of this evaluation framework vis-a-vis the associated compute cost, and discuss implications for standardizing evaluation. We find that the ranking of leading methods remains stable under several variations of this framework, pointing to avenues for reducing the cost of evaluation. Overall, our findings indicate progress in unlearning, with top-performing competition entries surpassing existing algorithms under our evaluation framework. We analyze trade-offs made by different algorithms and strengths or weaknesses in terms of generalizability to new datasets, paving the way for advancing both benchmarking and algorithm development in this important area.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑