arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2406.08164cs.CV

ConMe:重新思考现代VLMs组合推理的评估

ConMe: Rethinking Evaluation of Compositional Reasoning for Modern VLMs

MIT(麻省理工学院);IBM Research(IBM研究院);UC Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校);MIT-IBM(麻省理工学院-IBM联合机构);Tuebingen AI Center(蒂宾根人工智能中心);UMass Amherst(马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校);JKU(约翰内斯·开普勒大学)
Irene Huang, Wei Lin, M. Jehanzeb Mirza, Jacob A. Hansen, Sivan Doveh, Victor Ion Butoi, Roei Herzig, Assaf Arbelle, Hilde Kuehne, Trevor Darrell, Chuang Gan, A… 展开作者

Irene Huang, Wei Lin, M. Jehanzeb Mirza, Jacob A. Hansen, Sivan Doveh, Victor Ion Butoi, Roei Herzig, Assaf Arbelle, Hilde Kuehne, Trevor Darrell, Chuang Gan, Aude Oliva, Rogerio Feris, Leonid Karlinsky

AI总结:

本文提出ConMe基准及数据生成流程,通过VLMs相互对话协作暴露弱点,自主生成困难组合推理问答,使最先进VLMs性能下降达33%,重新确立CR挑战。

摘要:

组合推理(CR)需要掌握属性、关系和词序的重要性。最近的视觉语言模型(VLMs),由视觉编码器和大语言模型(LLM)解码器组成,在此类推理任务中展现了卓越的能力。这引出了一个关键问题:VLMs是否已有效解决了CR挑战?我们推测,由于现有CR基准依赖仅使用LLM的负文本生成流程,可能不足以挑战现代VLMs的极限。因此,生成的负样本要么偏离了VLMs的LLM解码器所学到的自然语言分布,要么在相应的图像上下文中显得极不可能。为了解决这些局限性,我们引入了ConMe——一个组合推理基准和一种利用VLMs生成“困难CR问答”的新颖数据生成流程。通过VLMs相互对话以协作暴露自身弱点的新概念,我们的流程自主生成、评估并选择具有挑战性的组合推理问题,建立了一个稳健的CR基准,并随后进行了人工验证。与先前的基准相比,我们的基准引发了高达33%的CR性能下降,即使对于最先进的VLMs也重新确立了CR挑战。

英文摘要:

Compositional Reasoning (CR) entails grasping the significance of attributes, relations, and word order. Recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs), comprising a visual encoder and a Large Language Model (LLM) decoder, have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in such reasoning tasks. This prompts a crucial question: have VLMs effectively tackled the CR challenge? We conjecture that existing CR benchmarks may not adequately push the boundaries of modern VLMs due to the reliance on an LLM-only negative text generation pipeline. Consequently, the negatives produced either appear as outliers from the natural language distribution learned by VLMs' LLM decoders or as improbable within the corresponding image context. To address these limitations, we introduce ConMe -- a compositional reasoning benchmark and a novel data generation pipeline leveraging VLMs to produce `hard CR Q&A'. Through a new concept of VLMs conversing with each other to collaboratively expose their weaknesses, our pipeline autonomously generates, evaluates, and selects challenging compositional reasoning questions, establishing a robust CR benchmark, also subsequently validated manually. Our benchmark provokes a noteworthy, up to 33%, decrease in CR performance compared to preceding benchmarks, reinstating the CR challenge even for state-of-the-art VLMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑