arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
稍安勿躁,官方尚未更新
arXiv 2406.04448stat.ME
收藏

改进受约束参数差分隐私测量精度的贝叶斯方法

Bayesian Methods to Improve The Accuracy of Differentially Private Measurements of Constrained Parameters

Ryan Janicki, Scott H. Holan, Kyle M. Irimata, James Livsey, Andrew Raim

AI总结:

本文提出利用贝叶斯建模与拒绝采样方法,在差分隐私保护下对受约束的人口计数和比值参数进行后验估计,从而在保证正式隐私和约束满足的同时提高测量精度。

摘要:

正式的披露规避技术对于确保已发布数据无法被用于识别个体信息是必要的。对未发布数据添加统计噪声可以实现差分隐私,从而提供正式的数学隐私保证。然而,噪声的注入导致数据发布的精度低于未添加噪声的情况,并可能使某些个体数据点变得不合理。例如,人口计数估计值为负,或计数比值的估计违反已知约束。保证已发布估计值满足这些已知约束的一种直接方法是设定一个统计模型,并在普查计数和比值上引入能够正确约束参数空间的先验。我们利用拒绝采样方法从后验分布中抽取样本,并证明该实现产生的人口计数和比值估计既保持了正式隐私,又比原始的无约束噪声测量更精确,并且保证满足先验约束。

英文摘要:

Formal disclosure avoidance techniques are necessary to ensure that published data can not be used to identify information about individuals. The addition of statistical noise to unpublished data can be implemented to achieve differential privacy, which provides a formal mathematical privacy guarantee. However, the infusion of noise results in data releases which are less precise than if no noise had been added, and can lead to some of the individual data points being nonsensical. Examples of this are estimates of population counts which are negative, or estimates of the ratio of counts which violate known constraints. A straightforward way to guarantee that published estimates satisfy these known constraints is to specify a statistical model and incorporate a prior on census counts and ratios which properly constrains the parameter space. We utilize rejection sampling methods for drawing samples from the posterior distribution and we show that this implementation produces estimates of population counts and ratios which maintain formal privacy, are more precise than the original unconstrained noisy measurements, and are guaranteed to satisfy prior constraints.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑