arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.04094cs.RO
收藏

AdapJ:一种面向软体机械臂的自适应扩展雅可比控制器

AdapJ: An Adaptive Extended Jacobian Controller for Soft Manipulators

Biorobotics Institute and the Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna(生物机器人研究所和机器人与人工智能卓越部门,圣安娜高等学院);Multi-scale Medical Robotics Centre and Chow Yuk Ho Technology Centre for Innovative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong(多尺度医疗机器人中心和创新医学技术中心,香港中文大学);Department of computer systems, Tallinn University of Technology(计算机系统系,塔林技术大学)

Zixi Chen, Xuyang Ren, Yuya Hamamatsu, Gastone Ciuti, Donato Romano, Cesare Stefanini

AI总结:

针对软体机械臂运动非线性、迟滞的控制难题,提出保留雅可比控制器简洁形式、引入独立参数的自适应扩展雅可比控制器AdapJ,经仿真和实物实验验证,其在少样本下性能优于多种主流控制器且适应性更强。

摘要:

软体机器人运动的非线性与迟滞特性给控制带来了挑战。为解决这些问题,雅可比控制器已被用于以线性形式近似非线性行为。神经网络等高精度控制器能够处理延迟和非线性运动,但它们需要大量数据集,且适应性较差。基于对这些控制器的新颖分析,我们提出了一种面向软体机械臂的自适应扩展雅可比控制器——AdapJ。该控制器保留了雅可比控制器的简洁形式,但引入了独立参数。与神经网络类似,其初始化和更新机制利用逆模型,无需构建对应的正向模型。在实验中,我们首先在仿真环境中对比了雅可比控制器、模型预测控制器、神经网络控制器、迭代反馈控制器与AdapJ的性能,进一步分析了AdapJ的参数如何随物理属性变化进行自适应调整。随后的实物实验验证表明,AdapJ在训练样本更少的情况下性能优于神经网络控制器、模型预测控制器和迭代反馈控制器,并且能够稳健适应不同控制频率、材料柔软度和外部干扰等变化条件。未来工作可包括控制器形式的在线调整以及更多场景下的适应性验证。

英文摘要:

The nonlinearity and hysteresis of soft robot motions present challenges for control. To solve these issues, the Jacobian controller has been applied to approximate the nonlinear behaviors in a linear format. Accurate controllers like neural networks can handle delayed and nonlinear motions, but they require large datasets and exhibit low adaptability. Based on a novel analysis on these controllers, we propose an adaptive extended Jacobian controller, AdapJ, for soft manipulators. This controller retains the concise format of the Jacobian controller but introduces independent parameters. Similar to neural networks, its initialization and updating mechanism leverages the inverse model without building the corresponding forward model. In the experiments, we first compare the performance of the Jacobian controller, model predictive controller, neural network controller, iterative feedback controller, and AdapJ in simulation. We further analyze how AdapJ parameters adapt in response to the physical property change. Then, real-world experiments have validated that AdapJ outperforms the neural network controller, model predictive controller, and iterative feedback controller with fewer training samples and adapts robustly to varying conditions, including different control frequencies, material softness, and external disturbances. Future work may include online adjustment of the controller format and adaptability validation in more scenarios.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑