arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.01477cs.LGstat.ML

MixMax:通过最优数据混合实现函数空间中的分布鲁棒性

MixMax: Distributional Robustness in Function Space via Optimal Data Mixtures

University of Toronto(多伦多大学);Vector Institute(矢量研究所)

Anvith Thudi, Chris J. Maddison

AI总结:

MixMax通过将群体DRO从参数空间重参数化到函数空间,利用极小极大定理和凸优化求解最优数据混合,从而提升最差情况性能,并在实验中优于或匹配现有基线。

摘要:

机器学习模型通常需要在多个预定义设置(如一组用户群体)中表现良好。最差情况性能是衡量这一需求的常用指标,也是群体分布鲁棒优化(group DRO)的目标。不幸的是,当损失函数在参数上非凸或模型类非参数化时,这些方法会遇到困难。在此,我们采取经典策略来解决这一问题:将群体DRO从参数空间重新参数化到函数空间,这带来了若干优势。首先,我们证明了在有界函数空间上的群体DRO满足极小极大定理。其次,对于交叉熵和均方误差,我们证明了极小极大最优混合分布是简单凸优化问题的解。因此,只要使用通用函数逼近器的模型类,群体DRO可以通过凸优化问题后接经典风险最小化问题来解决。我们将此方法称为MixMax。在我们的实验中,我们发现MixMax匹配或超越了标准群体DRO基线,特别是MixMax在ACSIncome和CelebA标注数据集的变体上,相对于唯一基线——数据平衡,提升了XGBoost的性能。

英文摘要:

Machine learning models are often required to perform well across several pre-defined settings, such as a set of user groups. Worst-case performance is a common metric to capture this requirement, and is the objective of group distributionally robust optimization (group DRO). Unfortunately, these methods struggle when the loss is non-convex in the parameters, or the model class is non-parametric. Here, we make a classical move to address this: we reparameterize group DRO from parameter space to function space, which results in a number of advantages. First, we show that group DRO over the space of bounded functions admits a minimax theorem. Second, for cross-entropy and mean squared error, we show that the minimax optimal mixture distribution is the solution of a simple convex optimization problem. Thus, provided one is working with a model class of universal function approximators, group DRO can be solved by a convex optimization problem followed by a classical risk minimization problem. We call our method MixMax. In our experi ments, we found that MixMax matched or outperformed the standard group DRO baselines, and in particular, MixMax improved the performance of XGBoost over the only baseline, data balancing, for variations of the ACSIncome and CelebA annotations datasets.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑