arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2405.09934cs.CVcs.AI

使用Fréchet域距离检测数字病理多示例学习中的域偏移

Detecting Domain Shift in Multiple Instance Learning for Digital Pathology Using Fréchet Domain Distance

Center for Medical Imaging Science and Visualization, Linköping University, University Hospital(林雪平大学 医学影像科学与可视化中心,大学医院);Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University(林雪平大学 科学技术系);Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University(林雪平大学 生物医学与临床科学系);Sectra AB(塞克特拉公司)

Milda Pocevičiūtė, Gabriel Eilertsen, Stina Garvin, Claes Lundström

AI总结:

该研究针对数字病理多示例学习对临床真实域偏移的敏感性不明问题,通过淋巴结全切片图像分类实验,验证域偏移影响并提出Fréchet域距离无监督指标,其与性能变化的相关性优于基线方法。

摘要:

多示例学习(Multiple-instance learning, MIL)是数字病理应用中极具吸引力的方法,因为它能降低数据收集和标注相关的成本。然而,目前尚不清楚MIL对临床真实场景下的域偏移(即可能对性能产生负面影响的数据分布差异)的敏感程度如何,也不清楚现有的域偏移检测指标是否能很好地适配这类算法。我们训练了一种基于注意力的MIL算法,用于分类淋巴结的全切片图像是否包含乳腺肿瘤转移灶。该算法在来自另一家国家医院的数据,以及对应不同域偏移程度的该数据的多个子集上进行了评估。我们的贡献包括:证明了数字病理领域的MIL会受到临床真实数据差异的影响;评估了MIL模型中哪些特征最适合检测性能变化;提出了一种名为Fréchet Domain Distance(FDD,Fréchet域距离)的无监督指标用于量化域偏移。我们通过与分类性能变化的平均皮尔逊相关系数来评估偏移度量的性能,其中FDD在10折交叉验证模型上达到了0.70。基线方法包括Deep ensemble(深度集成)、Difference of Confidence(置信度差异)和Representation shift(表示偏移),它们的平均皮尔逊相关系数分别为0.45、-0.29和0.56。对于需要验证MIL系统在新站点部署时是否可能可靠运行,且无需病理学家提供任何额外标注的医疗机构和供应商而言,FDD可能是一种有价值的工具。

英文摘要:

Multiple-instance learning (MIL) is an attractive approach for digital pathology applications as it reduces the costs related to data collection and labelling. However, it is not clear how sensitive MIL is to clinically realistic domain shifts, i.e., differences in data distribution that could negatively affect performance, and if already existing metrics for detecting domain shifts work well with these algorithms. We trained an attention-based MIL algorithm to classify whether a whole-slide image of a lymph node contains breast tumour metastases. The algorithm was evaluated on data from a hospital in a different country and various subsets of this data that correspond to different levels of domain shift. Our contributions include showing that MIL for digital pathology is affected by clinically realistic differences in data, evaluating which features from a MIL model are most suitable for detecting changes in performance, and proposing an unsupervised metric named Fréchet Domain Distance (FDD) for quantification of domain shifts. Shift measure performance was evaluated through the mean Pearson correlation to change in classification performance, where FDD achieved 0.70 on 10-fold cross-validation models. The baselines included Deep ensemble, Difference of Confidence, and Representation shift which resulted in 0.45, -0.29, and 0.56 mean Pearson correlation, respectively. FDD could be a valuable tool for care providers and vendors who need to verify if a MIL system is likely to perform reliably when implemented at a new site, without requiring any additional annotations from pathologists.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑